this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
1537 points (98.4% liked)

Political Memes

5483 readers
2423 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 274 points 2 months ago (7 children)

$15/hr is 10 years ago, now it should be 25

[–] Clent@lemmy.world 139 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's needs to be raised and indexed to inflation.

Raising it alone is not enough. We'll just spend another thirty years fighting for the next increase.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 59 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Some democratic states have actually done that like California and New York. There's been bills from some dems representatives to do that federally in the past

If dems get a tricecta, I suspect some dems would push for that again

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And then other Dems would block it! Sorry, I have no faith in good things happening. Still voting Dem though.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was pleasantly surprised with some of the bills Biden tried to pass while he had the absolute slimmest of majorities 3 years ago. My disdain for conservative Democrats was also very much strengthened through that experience...

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Agreed, and that's why I vote as progressive as I can in primaries.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is hiw businesses win this game. Whine about it to the point the amount you're asking isn't even enough, demand subsidies to increase wages and then give pretty much the same they paid a few years ago, pocketing the rest.

[–] Beldarofremulak@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

"Business innovation"

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Perhaps part of the problem is a fixation on the specific number and lack of consideration for the material needs of the people. How much does it cost to live in your city? That's the minimum wage. Is that $120/day? Is that $200/day? Is that $5000/day? That needs to be the wage floor.

Feel like you're spending too much money on labor? See about reducing the cost of living, then we can talk.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Minimum wage means minimum livable wage, and "livable" isn't the same as "survivable".

Anyone working should be able to afford the amenities we call living, not just scraping by. Children, transportation, food, healthcare, reasonable recreation, savings, retirement, self development and actualization. All of it.
People not working should be able to survive, and we should do everything we can to get them to that "living" point as well. Disability or a bad labor market shouldn't close someone off from eating, having children or going to the doctor.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 75 points 1 month ago (3 children)

My rule of thumb is "the less I'd like to do a job, the more the person doing it should be paid." It works well for all the so-called unskilled jobs that get routinely exploited.

[–] RidderSport@feddit.org 28 points 1 month ago

Not bad, has a few problems though, I would never want to be a banker, even worse an investment banker, yet those fuckers earn way more than I want them to

[–] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Go cleaning staff! Also other slave like jobs. It's a little bit sad that to make money you'd need to actively make your life worse, but it's a great starting point. It would also make the story billionaires make up about working hard have a real point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 62 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (18 children)

Hourly Rate Yearly Salary

$10 $20,800

$15 $31,200

$20 $41,600

$30 $62,400

$40 $83,200

$50 $104,000

$75 $156,000

$100 $208,000

To make an average wage (roughly 62k according to the national average) it'll need to be $30 an hour minimum.

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago

We have a locality pay scale BAKED IN to federal salaries. Federal salaries are established and updated yearly. Using this, we could get rid of a dedicated minimum wage number. All we need to do is set the minimum wage to the lowest amount a federal employee could be paid in that location, and you're all set. Federal minimum wage debate solved.

If the government can't find employees, then they need to raise the locality pay there, or bump up the payscale across the board. Same could be done for the minimum wage

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 58 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, they shouldn't make $15 an hour. They should make whatever is needed to sustain themselves and a family, including a pension and any healthcar costs. That's probably well over $15 an hour.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (9 children)

i think the last time i saw someone do the math, that by the time 15 is fully rollled out everwhere the minimum would need to be like 26-30 dollars an hour to keep up with ridiculous costs of everything.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 51 points 1 month ago (1 children)

15$ is too little now. They would need to make more.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Thats by design.

They took 10+ years to finally implement the 15 dollar minimum wage, explicitly so it would still be too low to live on by the time it was in, so they can turn around and go and lambast people for being "greedy" after getting what they wanted...while willfully obviating and distracting from the shit like rent and home prices that are getting furthe and further out of the average americans reach.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] PolishAndrew@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They also conveniently forget how recently these jobs were hailed as being essential to the function of society....covid taught us nothing lol

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sounds like even a minor general strike would get concessions pretty quick

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 39 points 1 month ago (7 children)

raising min wage doesn't raise prices... that's conservative bullshit

"we find prices grow by 0.36 percent for every 10 percent increase in the minimum wage."

[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

"The economy" is just money in motion. Like how electric charges moving create light, moving money carries and creates value in the exchange. When rich people soak up money from millions of people, they destroy all that value and the economy stagnates. When millions of people are given money and then spend it in millions of ways, the global economy improves.

We optimize our economy around stagnate money sitting in septic pools, when we should be trying to build an ocean of money that never stops flowing.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] rothaine@lemm.ee 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Y'all know that trick for toddlers where you give them a choice between two things so they don't throw a tantrum? Maybe we could try that.

"We can either raise the minimum wage to $22--"

Conservative: "NOOOOO don't WANT THAT, don't want! Poor people will TAKE ALL THE CHEESEBURGERS"

"--Or implement UBI. How does that sound?"

"...Ok."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SilentFury@lemm.ee 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The answer to all of these is actually no... Because it should be $23.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

This is how long the fight for 15 has been going on. We will finally get 15 when minimum wage should be 46 dollars

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Being disabled after a decade of working is fun.

Went from making $36 an hour to... about $11.50 from SSDI.

Was too injured to even apply for unemployment in time, not that it would have mattered as I was utterly incapable of 'seeking work'.

More fun examples of how the poor live

Pro: Managed to Qualify for Section 8 in only 6 months.

Con: It almost certainly won't matter, as I got evicted from the inability to work, and now my credit score is also abysmal, and all Section 8 is is privately owned apartments (cough slumlords cough) who choose to accept a portion of rent and utility payments from Sec 8, that can absolutely refuse you for an eviction or bad credit, and have their own waitlists.

Once awarded a Section 8 voucher, well they expire in a couple months if you don't find a place. So you have to wait months or years again for Section 8 applications to even open up again, then apply for Section 8 and wait months or years to be awarded a voucher again, and then apply to Section 8 accepting slums with gigantic waitlists again.

Roach motels for my foreseeable future!

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago

At this point, it should be 28

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I say make it a gradient based on zip codes.

High enough that the local average rent is no more than 30% of it.

Doesn't just make sure workers get paid adequately wherever they are, also provides a slight incentive towards making jobs in less developed regions of the country to bring more jobs out to the exurbs and such.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Ah, early 2021... back when $15/hr was at least somewhat decent. Heck, $15/hr was being fight for about a decade before even then. Maybe in ten more years $15/hr will become minimum wage and politicians will pat themselves on the back and claim they're the most pro-worker politician in US history for instituting a minimum wage that was argued for two decades in the past.

[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I suspect a number of middle-class workers are against the idea of a minimum wage increase because their wages have been mostly stagnant and they feel it's not fair that the lowest paid workers might approach their income, while billionaires and CEOs are buying up everything.

They're right, it isn't fair, but they're looking in the wrong direction. Instead of trying to prevent the lowest paid worker from approaching their income, they should be trying to reign in the top 1%. But I guess it's easier and feels better to say huge swaths of people don't deserve to make anywhere near as much money as they do rather than enduring the inconvenience of finding alternatives to Amazon, Facebook, Insta, Xitter, etc.

Not to dismiss the real problem of monopolies and market dominance-- but the docility and lack of resistance of such people would be startling if it weren't over shadowed by their misplaced contempt for the poor. edit: typo

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Breve@pawb.social 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I love asking them to explain what negative consequences raising minimum wage would have for inflation and the economy, then asking them to explain how lowering income taxes wouldn't be even worse.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 8 points 2 months ago

People they and everyone else depend on that they don't respect.

[–] CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why aren't conservative parties illegal worldwide yet?

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 month ago (21 children)

Because banning people you don't agree with from running for Congress is fascist, even if it's for what you believe is the right reasons. Everyone has a right to vote for who represents them, even if they're garbage.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›