this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
463 points (96.8% liked)

Science Memes

11130 readers
2724 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 127 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ah yes, mongols, known for their gentle and easy going temperament.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 65 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When it comes to religion, yes. When it comes to governance, lol

[–] enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

(As per K&G youtube channel) I learned that when it comes to believe system, the Mongols believe that everyone worships the same god, Tengri, but in varied way in every culture/religion they encounter.

They believe that as long as everyone submit themselves under the Mongol rule, it means they obey Tengri/Mongolian god.

There are various religious communities inside the empire but they also don't bother to do the worst thing possible to obliterate anyone who doesn't submit to Mongol, regardless their believe.

But I think in a smaller level it's also not as simple/straightforward as that. Mongolian Shamans also known to have conflicts with the Khan. Sometimes the Khan kept asking the Shamans to do a ritual over and over again until the result aligns with the Khan's desire. Or sometimes the Shaman (being a regarded class in their society) have their own political motive to do something against the Khan.

[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Also known for inventing the phrase "lend me your ear".

[–] CherenkovBlue@lemmy.myserv.one 93 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is this...Mongolian propaganda? Because the Kahns definitely did a whole lot of subjugating, raping and murdering. Not sure that really fits the "coexist" meme...

[–] scbasteve7@lemm.ee 77 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The meme format doesn't really work, but the joke they're trying to make is that even though they did all these terrible things, it was never because of religion. In fact, they just didn't give a fuck in what you believed in. Genghis even allowed religious figures to be exempt from taxation.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 48 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And let's be honest: the Mongolians were probably not worse than any other invader. War, destruction, looting and raping is kind of par for the course for most civilizations in history.

[–] scbasteve7@lemm.ee 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Honestly from the limited knowledge I have, Mongolians seemed to be the one of the chillest of invaders. They gave you a clear choice, let us rule you or die. And once they ruled you they allowed many freedoms that crusaders and colonizers didn't. Their tactics were brutal and I think that's why people see them as so evil.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Mongolians seemed to be the one of the chillest of invaders.

Literal mountains of skulls...

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For every mountain of skulls there were 10 villages that decided Mongolian rule wasn't so bad.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

...in comparison to the mountain of skulls, that were likely raped before they died.

[–] MelastSB@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The Skull Throne ain't gonna build itself

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

TBF, the Mongolian invasions are literally what gave birth to Khorne

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

Mongolians were the OG (original grimdark)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Well sure, but they were really good at it all

[–] Haagel@lemmings.world 82 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Modern Mongolia, perhaps. The Golden Horde of Genghis Khan was not so tolerant!

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 70 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yes, they were. Genghis' Mongols didn't generally force religious change in the people who they subjugated.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's actually a cool belief system from what I've read, known as Tengriism; they had their own beliefs but (and I hope I have this right) that whatever religious worldview prevailed locally was considered not just valid as a personal or cultural expression, but actually metaphysically true as well. That seems fantastic, doesn't it? Patchwork metaphysics.

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I’m not an expert but from what I’ve read most ancient world deities were attached to certain geographies (it would be reasonable to sort of leave the boundaries of your gods) so I wonder if this comes from that tradition. The roman catholics sure successfully weaponized monotheism.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Provided you paid your tribute and obeyed the Khan's laws they were cool with just about everyone. Fail to do either of those things and you're in for a bad time.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I mean pretty consistent with today’s neoliberal values:

It’s okay to exploit people as long as we don’t discriminate.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The neoliberals of the 13th and 14th century

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 29 points 1 month ago

The way I hear it told, Genghis Khan liked all types of women. 😉

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

It was mixed. Their subjects were more free to travel, practise religions, and generally exist within the empire than without it. It was just that transition. The Mongols liked to do things the easy way, or the really easy way.

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 44 points 1 month ago

Genghis Khan: Are you good at killing and terrorizing my enemies? Yes? Ok, see those fuckers over there? Conquer them. I don't care how. Burn it all down. Re-route an entire river. I just want them paying tribute.

[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I find it interesting how the Mongolian empire has kind of taken a 180 in its historical image. Not long ago they were viewed as just cartoon villains that destroyed everything. But now you see so many people talking about some of the "good" aspects that it almost makes them seem strangely benevolent.

The reality of course was that they were an empire, and like all empires they steamrolled and destroyed anything that stood in their way while taking advantage of anything that furthered their goals. They probably killed far more people than they helped if you asked anyone living through the time.

Dan Carlin's podcast, Hardcore History, has a series called Wrath of the Khans where he talks about this in length and it's very interesting to think about.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

from my understanding , it's a chain of

You see that village over there? they resisted. we burnt everything , killed every man and child, and raped all the women.

See the other village over there? they joined us, and we gave them access to goods from across the world, the latest technology and treat them better than their previous rulers.

Your choice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

When people think about Rome they usually imagine the roads and the aquaducts and not so much the crucifixions and the slavery.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Yeah, the Mongolians front-loaded most of their atrocities. Rome was more of a slow burn

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Rome was both. The mongols raped and slaughtered. The Romans were too civilized to do that as much, instead they just enslaved some of your village so they could die in the mines or fields or construction projects. And then there’s the internal atrocities. Rome had three servile wars and then without easing up even a bit never had another.

The Kahns were more like the Shahs, conqueror emperors seeking to hold the great titles of the world like emperor of China or pharaoh and in doing so became one. The Romans were like America “we’re different snd our own thing” before being a different kind of brutal

[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, they might imagine one specific crucifixion

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Strangely enough I feel like that crucification isn't much associated with the Romans. Even though the Romans were the ones who carried it out Judas gets almost 100% of the ire.

Even Jews are given more blame by antisemitic Christians. Like, no one is starting up a pogrom against Italians because their great great great grandpa might've been the guy who stabbed Jesus in the ribs.

[–] Shard@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Theologically, all mankind was to blame because of their sins.

But it's far easier to blame a minority and it had the added benefit of pushing whatever agenda the ruling class had.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

China doesn't want friends. That's why they built a wall to keep those friendly Mongols out.

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

God damn Mongolians keep breaking down my city wall!!

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They were also great environmentalists who did a lot to fight global warming.

[–] Sebbe@lemmy.sebbem.se 10 points 1 month ago

And overpopulation!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Not with the owner of City Wok!

Or Jin Sakai.

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ghost of Sushi is such a masterpiece magnum opus of an amazing fucking game.

[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I can’t wait for Ghost of Sushi 2: Nigiri wa oishii desu

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago

So, that's a honey badger in a capy disguise?

[–] capital@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Atheists: Us too, right?…

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

As long as you pay them tribute, they don't give a fuck.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Why are they so wonderful?

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

China enters the chat

load more comments
view more: next ›