this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
164 points (99.4% liked)

Canada

7150 readers
173 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When people call the current political system a "bourgeois democracy", this is what they mean. The interests of politicians lay with their fellow capitalist oligarchs

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

The interests of politicians lay with their fellow capitalist oligarchs

AlwaysHaveBeen.jpg

[–] PM_ME_YOUR_ZOD_RUNES@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think this problem is specific to Montreal.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Nor to Canada, regards from the UK

[–] blazera@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is solvable by outlawing landlords.

[–] ExiledElf@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really though. 10.8% of homes nationally are unoccupied. Can you imagine how much more accessible housing would be if landlords couldn’t sit on properties to find the next tenant to bleed dry?

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's a myth. What it actually means is they have no regular occupant, which means for example they're student houses full of students with a home address elsewhere.

[–] Falmarri@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it also be a conflict of interest if they were renters? How can someone not have any interest in housing?

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but in that case their interests would be a human right. It's a conflict of interests because they are for profit owners; not just owners.

[–] Rocket@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

are for profit owners

Which homeowner isn't? There is good reason why nobody is moving to high unemployment Newfoundland to buy up the houses they can't give away even amid the "housing crisis". A home, even your primary residence, is a capital asset. Basically everyone is living where they do because that house provides them profit – most likely by it being a tool to provide access to a highly profitable labour market.

It may be a conflict of interest, but when there is no interest not in conflict, what are you going to do?

[–] ExiledElf@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s an obfuscation of the point. The conflict of interest is that they directly make money from their property - landlords rigging prices and buying all the property are the problem, and they’re also the ones making laws to regulate themselves.

[–] MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee -4 points 1 year ago

Why shouldn’t landlords be able to hold public office? Run against them if you’re so much better.