this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
278 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19238 readers
2115 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

He was just being a sulky boy because nobody would let him nuke that hurricane.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

But but he is bringing them star link now!!! /s

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Anyone trying to politicize any disaster is an absolute piece of garbage.

[–] eacapesamsara@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hard disagree, many disasters were directly caused by political decisions. Such as the severity and frequency of the last decade of hurricanes. We chose to make them that severe, actively, wantonly chose that. It should be political.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Going to agree with you here, if the people who decide disaster relief are elected or controlled by elected officials, it is inherently political. Was this not the same year that the ex president insulted himself by calling the president of Puerto Rico names do to his response to a hurricane. You know, the same hurricane they obstructed relief funding for

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/new-probe-confirms-trump-officials-blocked-puerto-rico-receiving-hurri-rcna749

[–] Deello@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

You know, the same hurricane they obstructed relief funding for.

Give the man some credit. He gave them some paper towels.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 0 points 2 months ago

Well how else are they supposed to keep the money for themselves? ;)