this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
680 points (99.3% liked)

News

23618 readers
3321 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Toward the end of the debate, Democratic vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz asked Vance to affirm that Trump lost the last election. “Did he lose the 2020 election?” Walz asked.

"Tim, I'm focused on the future," Vance replied, before pivoting to press Walz on censorship on social media.

"That is a damning non-answer," Walz said. "I'm pretty shocked by this. He lost the election. This is not a debate, it's not anything anywhere other than in Donald Trump's world."

Walz noted that the reason that former Vice President Mike Pence — who was the target of "hang Mike Pence" chants from pro-Trump rioters who invaded the Capitol in 2021 — wasn't on the debate stage is because he refused to overturn the election on Trump's behalf.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 120 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I didn't watch the debate but it's a bit disheartening that every headline so far has "Vance" in it but not "Walz". The media always give the Republicans far more free publicity than the Democrats.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago

Working like they intended, and it sucks.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 months ago

I did watch the debate and my immediate take away was that it was a cordial debate, which is sad that being cordial is now abnormal enough for that to be the first thing that stood out.

But with that being said, after thinking about it longer, I realized that the reason it was so cordial is because the questions asked were sane-washing almost all of Trump's positions. I don't see how the number one question would ever be anything other than:

"Senator Vance, your running mate has been convicted, by a jury of his peers, of 34 felonies. He is current facing indictments for stealing and concealing sensitive classified documents containing information vital to our national defense. He has also been indicted for conspiracy to defraud the United States, along with three additional charges, for his efforts to overthrow our democracy when he lost the 2020 election. He has also been charged with eight felonies in Georgia, including two counts of conspiracy to commit forgery in the first degree; again, for his attempts at subverting our democracy to install himself as the unelected ruler of our country. He has publicity stated that he wants to be a dictator and throw his political opponents, as well as journalists and others who criticize him, in jail. The only reason your candidate is on the ballot this November is because the Supreme Court ruled that states do not have the ability to keep insurrectionists off the ballot - and they have also declared that various other crimes your candidate have committed cannot be prosecuted due to an alarming declaration that presidents are mostly above the law.

The question, Senator Vance, is why is your candidate qualified for anything other than wearing an orange jumpsuit in prison?"

[–] rhombus@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

That’s the whole Republican strategy at this point. They realized that any publicity, no matter how crazy they have to be to get it, ultimately benefits them. No matter how well Walz performed, no matter how reasonable and objectively right he is, Vance gets the publicity through his nonstop lies.

[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 54 points 2 months ago (1 children)

it’s really weird to be beholden to trump

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Vance, and everyone guy that goes along with him, are just one conversation away from being literal cucks.

Trump is going to fuck Vance's couch, and I'm not going to feel bad for him.

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 0 points 2 months ago

And he’ll make Vance watch

[–] Maven@lemmy.zip 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If he won the 2020 election then he wouldn't be able to run again... Do they admit he lost or do they drop out?

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If he won the 2020 election then he wouldn’t be able to run again…

There are no rules. There is only what lies the masses (perhaps even enough to win election, with a little bit of Electoral College bs) will accept, and there seems to be no clear limit to that.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

To the surprise of no one.

[–] Chespirito@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What a sleazy person he is. He’s well spoken so his answers seem coherent but if you actually listened to him speak you would pick up that he would say half truths at best. At least he gave the people a presidential debate unlike his boss

[–] Flying_Hellfish@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I don't know if you watched the debate, but his little smirks to the camera after some of his comments were making me ill.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Trump demands he answer that way.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 3 points 2 months ago

And The Base now that they've been conditioned into believing it is true.

We should expect better from these people out of principle, but we really shouldn't expect any different from them as we know the current circumstances...

[–] Cargon@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Vance was definitely the kid in grade school that plucked and ate the hair of the girl who sat in front of him. I wonder if she's okay.

[–] bamfic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

And the couch too

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can someone link me the VP debate discussion thread?

I wonder if maybe me or my home instance is banned from that community.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh man. I had blocked that sub. Silly me.

Thanks for the assist!

[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The biggest takeaway for me is that all the good sounds bites are going to be Vance sticking his foot in his mouth. Vance had a bunch of safe and boring answers so nothing for Trump's base, who already dislike Vance. Walz was probably nervous but he definitely missed several chances to call things out.

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think someone coaching him told him to take the highroad, and be nice.

[–] nomous@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

That someone was foolish, you can't play nice with these people. They just interpret it as weakness.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

And he refused to weigh in on the divisive issue of whether the sky was up or down. Or if water is good for you.

[–] Gypsyhermit123@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

“ Censorship on social media”…like Musk blocking users and trying to control the narrative.

I’m worried about this too!

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This should be disqualifying but Trump has fucked this country so badly that there are plenty of voters that can't see how big of a deal it is that a VP pick can't even say if a candidate lost the previous election or not.

[–] Cheems@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

If he thinks that he was actually in power this entire time he shouldn't be able to run for a third term