this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
8 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7153 readers
290 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When it first came out, my first thought was privacy.

It's the single most immutable piece of information about a person. You can change your clothes, hair, face, address, phone number, driver's license, passport and SSN (a little harder, but doable), hell -- even your fingerprints if you really must.

But your DNA?

And you'd put it out on some webserver, voluntarily, as unprotected medical data?

[–] golli@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

information about a person

Not only one person, but also their relatives, who didn't consent to begin with. You of course don't get all of it, but if you e.g. have the DNA of a parent, then you also get information about their children.

Say for example they have some genetic predisposition for an illness, then their child is probably also more likely to get it. Better hope that in the future there are still laws against using this kind of data for determining health insurance.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

it's so crazy to me how people just rushed to hand over their DNA to some random company

I have zero evidence for this, but I feel like JD Vance really really wants these data for some reason.