this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
190 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18992 readers
2546 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drdiddlybadger@pawb.social 65 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I continually fail to see how anyone could think Trump was good for the economy when he lowered taxes and raised spending by so much. Then tbe whole tariff thing that just fucked up supply and prices and the deportation scares that caused crops to sit rotting. What the fuck.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every Republican administration since at least Reagan has done the same thing. The cut taxes for the rich and then increase spending every and then a Democrat comes in and cleans up their mess. Yet somehow they manage to convince people that they are the party that's good for the economy.

It's because knock-on effects of government policies take around 4-6 years to fully materialize. Republicans fully understand this and also understand that the average American dumb fuck has a political long term memory of 3 months at best. They can fuck everything up in a term or two, pass the buck to the incoming Democrat, and then blame the Democrat for everything they completely broke. Just look at the final massive deregulation that Bush pushed leading to the 2008 crash that Obama had to deal with - which they could then conveniently blame on Obama himself!

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What you're seeing is the end result of literally decades of propaganda. Objectively, Democrats have been better for the economy for about 90 years.

I am utterly convinced if ya got rid of talk radio you could revert a shit tonne of it. Dont even need to do much, just deregulate AM radio and let the hobbyists broadcast whatever they want theyll drown the airwaves with niche metal in five seconds.

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I trust a month old stiff crusty cumsock to do a better job than Trump at lowering inflation.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Oh really? The demented babbling rapist traitor is falling behind polls of women on the economy, is he?

Jesus Fred Christ on a Busted Goddamn Crutch these headlines are insanity.

[–] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I have literally no idea why anyone would trust Republicans more on the economy. Every single Republican president has worse economic outcomes than Democratic presidents.

Trump in particular is even worse. Who looks at his history of failed businesses and says yeah he understands finance?

[–] Seraph@fedia.io 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's insane that any women considered Trump for any reason other than women's rights. Really how many women thought "I don't mind that he wants to control my body, but is he good for the economy?"

Goofy shit.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago

Realtors and landlords, all of em

[–] crawancon@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

wait, how did he have 'ground' with women in the first place ? what non idiot female thinks he is a good candidate for women's rights?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Racism and holding on to white privilege that's how. White women voted Trump in droves in both 16 and 20

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

White college-educated women shift left, so the cure is to send them all to college. (For example, I entered college a John Anderson Republican and have voted Democrat in every election since, becoming more progressive as I age into oldfartitude.)

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

white women vote republican on the whole (although hillary got just over 50pc of the white woman vote).

we'll see if thats shifted v soon

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t think either of them will on any meaningful level, if at all. Maybe I’m just jaded but I haven’t seen cost of living go down in my lifetime, and I blame the infinite growth economic model. If a politician isn’t willing to make concrete steps towards moving away from that then I don’t imagine anything will be done about inflation.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The federal reserve's interest rates are good chunk of what's going to determine inflation. Trump wants to gut their independence and force them to cut interest rates to near zero. That will make inflation explode

Mwanwhile the current administration is finally actually going after big monopolies after decades of inaction. Will take more time to go through the courts but that can bring down prices in some industries too. Do you think trump will really continue that or stop the lawsuits the minute he gets power?

Other Trump plans are extremely inflationary as well. He plans to put massive tarrifs on a lot of goods. His plans to do deportations that include US citizens will also raise prices too

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are they? What actions are they taking? I know in Canada our NDP just broke it off with the Liberals for doing exactly the opposite of that.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The federal trade commission has started monopoly lawsuits after a number of big companies. Plus going after other anti-competitive practices. Here's just a handful of the latest FTC's actions:

Democratic National Committee (DNC) - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Democratic National Committee (DNC):

MBFC: Questionable - Credibility: Low - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Politico - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Politico:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.politico.com/news/2024/10/04/trump-women-economy-poll-00182451
https://events.democrats.org/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support