this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
120 points (90.5% liked)

Games

16566 readers
651 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Happily, PlayStation 5 manages to deliver a creditable rendition of the game, but the now legendary Act Three continues to humble CPU performance - perhaps more than we anticipated going in.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sp6@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More info from the article: quality mode is 1440p 30fps, and performance mode is 960p (upscaled to 1440p using FSR2) 60fps. Although late-game, specifically the big cities in act 3, can dip into mid-20fps range

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

So not exactly

[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't get all the performance complaints about Act 3. The worst lag I ever had in the entire game was the first time I walked into the druid grove, dropped to 1-5fps for like 20 seconds and then it was more or less fine the rest of the game. One crash in 160 hours of playing, and I'm still on patch 0.2 atm.

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait did you play like 5 hours a day or is that the beta?

[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

That is the full release only. It's also less than accurate to say 5 hours a day everyday, it was more like 10-15 hours a day with some days where I didn't play at all.

[–] catshit_dogfart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think this game could run on PS4 just fine. Turn off raytracing and a few other things and it would probably work.

But then, I guess they can't keep releasing for the old console forever.

[–] sadreality@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If there is money in it... Why not?

We got millions of gamers on old hardware. If they can do it, let all gamers have at it imho

[–] exscape@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

There's no RT in BG3. At least not yet.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it runs very nicely on ultra on a variety of hardware. It's been optimized and has even improved since release.

I am hoping they improved the controller interface, though. I use that even though I play the PC version, and it was somewhat broken as of a couple weeks ago.

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago

This article repeatedly says that the game is running in 1440p, but I thought that the PS5 didn’t support 1440p. TIL they added it.

[–] Weslee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's runs on ultra (minus raytracing) on my 1060 gtx, I'm not surprised it runs well on consoles, the game is pretty nicely optimized

[–] ayaya@lemdro.id -1 points 1 year ago

You probably haven't gotten to Act 3 yet, the game is extremely CPU bound. I have a Ryzen 9 7950X and while Act 1 and 2 were basically locked to 144fps the entire time, in Act 3 I have seen dips down to the 40s.