this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
51 points (90.5% liked)

Stocks

798 readers
28 users here now

A community for discussing stocks.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘stupid’ questions. The world won’t be made better or worse by snarky comments schooling naive newcomers on Lemmy.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

By institutional investors I’m guessing you mean pension plans and mutual funds. Which means a lot of average working people who have invested for their retirement.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

It could mean that, or maybe the rich own most of those mutual funds too? Unfortunately the video links to a probably-AI-generated Medium article that references an article by The Atlantic that is from 2007 and about an unrelated topic and obviously isn't the actual source for the 89% figure, so checking the actual numbers would require more work.

[–] picnicolas@slrpnk.net 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

About two thirds of Americans have retirement money in the stock market. “Institutional investors” include retirement funds and mutual funds.

Source: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R47699

Here’s a good breakdown of wealth inequality in the US

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

That doesn't really answer the question of whether the 89% figure is misleading due to regular investors having stake in institutional investors though, as suggested by the comment above mine. This would require information on the proportion of those funds owned by wealthy people vs non wealthy. That said you're clearly giving better info than the OP video so kudos for that

[–] picnicolas@slrpnk.net 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

The second link I posted shows that.

Edit: this goes into a lot of depth on income, assets, and debts by quartile: https://usafacts.org/articles/how-this-chart-explains-americans-wealth-across-income-levels/

[–] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought it said "equites" and assumed they were talking about horses

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Looking at the etymology of "equities" everything claims it comes from "aequitas," the Latin word for "justice, equality, conformity, fairness," but I find myself wondering if it's also related to the "Equites" or "equestrian" class (the class just below the aristocratic "patrician" class, basically being defined as mechants/businesspeople wealthy enough to own horses). Frankly, it would fit just as well.