this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
195 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18992 readers
2689 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As the control of the Senate hangs in the balance, GOP candidates across the country are facing a similar problem: Troubling and bizarre past statements, both in-person and on social media, are coming back to haunt them. But in Minnesota, Royce White is an even more extreme case.

In a tweet from 2022 that has since resurfaced, White claims that “‘bad guys” won the second world war, saying, “The bad guys won in WWII. There were no ‘good guys’ in that war. The controlling interests had a jump ball. If you look closely, you see the link between liberalism and communism in the Allied forces.”

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

what’s this obsession republicans have with calling people “bad guys”? JD vance said it at least 5 times during the debate, and i’ve noticed it being used more in general. aside from republicans, i’ve only seen it used in jokes

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Wow, who is surprised that a GOP candidate turned out to be a neo-nazi, Nazi adjacent, or sympathetic to Nazis?

....

That's right, no one.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 24 points 10 hours ago

Usually "past statements" ends up being something from high school or college where at least the young and dumb defense can help a tiny bit. This is from two years ago lol

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

This is the same guy who called Mitch McConnell a RINO btw. Fucking next level looney tunes, even for a Conservative.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 10 hours ago

Obligatory "Tell me you're a Nazi without telling you're a Nazi"

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Framing WWII as "good-guy/ bad-guy" betrays the staggering naiveté of a History Channel graduate. But this was a long time ago, he's probably moved on to the Fall of Rome by now.

[–] heavy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

History Channel graduate

Love that

[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.org 15 points 12 hours ago

He is aware that he wouldn’t even have been born if things had turned out otherwise?

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago
[–] AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social 7 points 13 hours ago

I have seen exactly one yard sign for him.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago

Where you at now AIPAC?

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -2 points 13 hours ago

The news source of this post could not be identified. Please check the source yourself. Media Bias Fact Check | bot support