this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
448 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19248 readers
2224 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new report details how the Trump White House secretly killed an FBI investigation into the sexual assault allegations against then–Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

The White House under sexual abuser Donald Trump secretly worked to suppress an FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh while his Supreme Court nomination was under consideration by the Senate. 

In September 2018, when Kavanaugh was accused of sexual assault, Trump promised that the FBI would have “free rein” to fully investigate the claims, adding that the bureau was “talking to everybody.” 

“I want them to interview whoever they deem appropriate, at their discretion,” Trump posted on Twitter at the time. However, The Washington Post reported Tuesday that Trump’s assertions were all a farce, citing a new report by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Whitehouse’s report states that the FBI was directed to conduct a limited investigation in only a week, and requested “additional guidance” from the White House. But Trump administration officials never provided any authorization for a deeper probe into the allegations against Kavanaugh.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 77 points 2 months ago

Convicted felon, rapist, protects an alleged rapist

[–] officermike@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Is there anything Trump hasn't lied about?

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 13 points 2 months ago

You have to have some true statements here and there like "I'm a liar" otherwise you dip into paradox territory.

The only consistent thing about him is that he is always lying.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

How hot he finds his daughter?

[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't think he was lying about that.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago
[–] officermike@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Thanks for reminding me!

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He got a letter from north Korea?

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

"This is your FINAL NOTICE that your vehicle's warranty is about to expire!"

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 30 points 2 months ago

Imagine that.

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

Rapist protects other rapists so the can rape some more

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if this wouldn’t be grounds to reopen a more thorough investigation under a Democratic president.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't matter. The only means of reversing this is impeachment of a SCOTUS judge, or him stepping down willingly. That's why things like passing laws for term limits matter, to at least eventually get these people off the bench.

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 1 points 2 months ago

It’s sad, but honestly my my hope with that would be further erosion of the public support and opinion of the conservative wing of SCoTUS and a growth in support for expansion.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

A functional Congress would have him off any cases by the end of the day and an indictment trial scheduled to start by next week to get him off the bench. If you or I lied and changed the results of a background check our employers would be well within their prerogative to fire with cause.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Then why didn't the FBI hold a press conference and disclose this to the public? Make it known what the President was doing?

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"Rapist Trump Lied About--" needs to start every headline for stories about that guy.

[–] Soup@lemmy.cafe 4 points 2 months ago

Wait… you mean rapist Donald Trump? We taking about that rapist? Or a different one?