this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
551 points (89.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

9680 readers
1140 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Have any of you tried getting 3 kids around town with public transport? 10 minutes of kids songs in the car = 45 minutes of screaming and accusatory stares in the bus.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This woman clearly has one aggressively neurotypical child. Not 3 neurodivergent ones.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably. What are examples?

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you tried bringing your kids up properly 😂

[–] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Have you tried sucking my buttery grundle?

[–] elouboub@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

That would require people voting for parties that want that.

[–] MyFairJulia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This idea might be just crazy enough... TO GET US ALL KILLED!

[–] Jimbabwe@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Because planned economies are a terrible idea. We would be doing this efficiently and organically if the demand for bikes and public transportation was higher and the demand for cars was lower.

Why don’t we uproot all our vegetable crops and grow cherry trees? Cherries are delicious so this is obviously a great idea!

The only reason you have food on your plate is because economies adjust incrementally from the ground up, not all at once from the top down.

[–] Airport_Bar@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If you uproot an old failing oak without plans to plant something in its absence, you’ll be left with a big hole and no shade.

Edit: Maybe I’m agreeing with some of what was said and I’m misunderstood. Either way, I agree with understanding demand as it relates to a planned economy.

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago

This is a problem with some poorly executed pedestrianisation/walkable area conversions IMO.

I like it since it means more car free spaces for me and my 🚲, but those without a bike aren't going to wait around a hour for a bus, they'll hop in their car and drive to an alternative location. They might not even be familiar with bike paths and routes to get there, especially if they're not comfortable riding on the road.

When car-first infrastructure is ripped out, people need to be introduced to alternatives and the alternatives need to be attractive, otherwise the status-quo will shift elsewhere

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›