this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
289 points (96.8% liked)

Not The Onion

11984 readers
541 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

"I have a great idea"

[–] perfectlyundone@lemmy.world 79 points 2 days ago

The rules were that you guys weren’t going to fact check

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I think the only deception in this case was self-inflicted.

[–] Hamartia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Nobody asking if the bag belonged to Baggenstos? Nominative determinism win?

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The true crime was the lie

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Nope. The picture shows the bag contained other illegal items, therefore it wasn't full of drugs.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago

There were more molecules of air than the total number of drugs.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago

Indeed, the other items were in the car, along with the bag.

When officers... searched the car and discovered cash, a loaded revolver, scales — and a bag that had “Definitely not a bag full of drugs” printed on it, with drugs inside...

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

At least if you're gunna do crime, have a sense of humor about it

[–] apocalypticat@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You keep using that word...

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Damm I really thought that would work Ill throw away my bag that says the same thing.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

...but the bag said!

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Generally I would agree. but after reading the first couple paragraphs, I think I gotta back the police up on this one.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

stealing a car is bad, but the majority of the process is insurance companies anyway, the police are a minor part of the bureaucratic process.

[–] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not a big fan of the fentanyl either

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I dont really care all that much either way for people who want to do drugs. They should be legalized, licensed and produced safely, with addict treatment going to medical and mental health services, not the police.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

The main concern with fentanyl is that people who want to do drugs probably don't want to do fentanyl; they're probably seeking heroin, and getting fentanyl that they've been lied to about.

But the solution to that isn't to continue the failed policy of prohibition, it's legalization and regulation, so fuck the dealers who lie about what they're selling, but also yes, fuck the police.

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago

The addicts are not going to submit themselves to the medical services voluntarily.