this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
570 points (91.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9735 readers
1135 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"It's not like the government is forcing you to buy a car!"

If you live in a city with parking minimums, yes they fucking are.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] humblebun@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 hours ago

I adore how they use mopeds and scooters in Asia

[–] raptore39@lemm.ee 21 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I was reading about a study that showed how much the climate temperature would rise if every house had solar panels on their roof. I then immediately thought, hey now, what if we had less asphalt everywhere, would that not affect overall temperatures as well?

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What was the conclusion? Asphalt shingles and slate shingles are already dark, so I'd imagine it would impact covered lighter roofing more.

[–] raptore39@lemm.ee 8 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

You have a good point there. The study was done using simulation models, so I should look into what they took into account and maybe who funded the study. You can read it here

[–] atx_aquarian@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Just to be really clear, too, they're looking at local effects (they say "urban microclimate"), not overall climate.

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Urban fabric is when everything’s a building, meaning you can’t go anywhere unless they’ve got the door open for you.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago

"Dark urban alleyways are the scariest parts of a city", I say as I dart across twelve lanes of traffic on foot.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Are you proposing a society where we never leave our cars and every business is a drive thru? Even if you drive to a wal mart today, they still have to have the door open for you to shop there.

And our current urban fabric is everything is a road, you can't go anywhere unless you drive a car. Can't afford a car? Too young to drive? Have a health condition that prevents you from driving? Want to choose a car free life? Too bad.

[–] amelia@feddit.org 50 points 14 hours ago (15 children)

As a European, this is the first time I ever heard about parking minimums. What a horrible concept.

[–] menemen@lemmy.ml 19 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

From Germany: huh? Quite common around here and I am sure in other european countries as well, despite having different city building concepts than the US. Lately it is slowly being replaced by bike infrastructure demands (and there was always the public transport demands), but it still exists.

[–] amelia@feddit.org 14 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I'm from Germany too. Is it really?! I had never heard of that. It can't be a thing inside cities though, can it? I honestly can't even think of a place where it would make any sense. Surely shops that are located outside dense urban areas would try to make sure they have enough parking space anyway.

[–] menemen@lemmy.ml 14 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

It is naturally very complicated in Germany, it is Germany after all. Some Bundesländer have globale Vorgaben, others leave it to the Kommunen. But it is normally part of a Bebauungsplan, also in cities. It is oftentimes a flexible concept though. Here a little start into the toppic.

[–] Flipper@feddit.org 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yes it's true. Where I live there is even parking space allocated for storage space. For each 100m² one parking space. Which is truly a ridiculous requirement.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago

In this thread: A lot of misconceptions and more than a few poorly thought out comments.

Also in this thread: Identifying the need to restructure the current standard before car usage can be realistically reduced by large amounts.

[–] hobovision@lemm.ee 17 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The horrible AI slop looks so bad if you look at it for longer than a second. Do better yall.

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 23 points 14 hours ago

Thing is: you don't need to look at it longer than a second to understand what is meant to be conveyed. So no, goal achieved, good use of resources instead of overspending on one useless metric (=making it realistic)

load more comments
view more: next ›