this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
164 points (99.4% liked)

Privacy

1254 readers
38 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Ategon@programming.dev
danielintempesta@programming.dev
164
Google is purging ad-blocking extension uBlock Origin from the Chrome Web Store (www.techspot.com)
submitted 1 month ago by lemmee_in@lemm.ee to c/privacy@programming.dev
37 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JRepin@lemmy.ml 50 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Best to switch to Firefox anyways, or even better privacy enhanced LibreWolf

This project is a custom and independent version of Firefox, with the primary goals of privacy, security and user freedom. LibreWolf is designed to increase protection against tracking and fingerprinting techniques, while also including a few security improvements. This is achieved through our privacy and security oriented settings and patches. LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev -1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

LibreWolf

Why are privacy/copyleft advocates so bad at naming?

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They usually don't have marketing departments or focus groups.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You obviously don't need those to come up with a good name; just some taste. Signal is a great example. Ladybird and Servo are good browser names if you want to stick to that. LibreWolf? Jesus, come on guys. Forgejo is another terrible name I heard recently. Apparently it's Esperanto, like that makes it ok somehow.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Apparently it’s Esperanto, like that makes it ok somehow.

God forbid some non-anglophone culture enters our collective consciousness.

[–] FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What would you call it instead?

We already have (had) Iceweasel, IceCat and Waterfox among others. All nice word plays on the original Firefox name. LibreWolf follows along the same path.

[–] LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org 1 points 1 month ago

Mintest, after only just (*inhales)

13 YEARS

finally rebranded to... something starting with "Lua". And I already forget the rest of the name because FOSS people suck at naming.

And I only even remembered the first part because I had once written mods in Lua, Mintest's scripting language of choice. Good luck for name recognition with anybody else.

[–] andioop@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

As someone who doesn't mind this name, what makes it bad?

EDIT: Someone below said difficult pronunciation. So talking about it in real life would be difficult.

It also might be relevant that I am very bad at naming things myself.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Difficult pronunciation and it also sounds like a lame "cool" name that a super nerd would think of.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

I purged chrome as a browser from my system a while ago

[–] scsi@lemm.ee 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There's a MV3 alternate (same dev!) "uBlock Origin Lite" which this article completely misses out on mentioning: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ublock-origin-lite/ddkjiahejlhfcafbddmgiahcphecmpfh

There are certain websites and tools which need chrome/chromium making it a necessary evil; for example there's a new trend in firmware flashing of devices like ESP32 boards and HAM/GMRS radios which are web based and use Chrome tech. This new MV3 fork isn't as good as the original but it's better than nothing and does stop some ad trash.

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Unless your firmware flasher is serving ads, and I really hope it isn't, there's no issue using chtome for things like that. Just use Firefox for everything else. It blocks more than just some ad trash. And you can have 2 browsers installed at the same time. They don't fight each other.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago

why would you want a browser based firmware flasher? the web browser should surely not deal with hardware. you don't even get to know if the flashing code has changed, or verify it in Any way

I have already hated the grapheneos web flasher, even if its just made for those for whom themost basic computer terms area dufficult task, like download this file, type cmd into the start menu, press enter, paste this ~~command~~ text, press enter. but it could have been solved with a most simple gui executable too!

[–] recursive_recursion@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Googles: "how to purge google from memory"

Everyone: Install Librewolf and Linux🌻

[–] Mikina@programming.dev 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We've just been told yesterday that to reduce our attack surface, only Edge will be allowed on our workstations. Reasoning is that it's difficult to make sure everyone is properly updates their browser, and since Edge is handled by windows updates, it's easier to monitor proper updates.

While I understand that reasoning, the tradeoff between pretty small risk reduction associated with unlikely attack surface from different browsers, and the massive drop in employee satisfaction, is simply not worth it.

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I use a mix of edge and chrome at work and Firefox and chrome at home. In boring work use (not signed into the browser, no extensions, no real customization), edge and chrome feel pretty similar to me. I will happily admit that I am using both basically out of the box and that if you're invested in the configuration of one it might be annoying to switch.

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I wonder how many still won't switch.

[–] kehet@suppo.fi 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Majority. Never underestimate the power of pre-installed software and default settings. There is a reason why Google is still paying Firefox big bucks to be the default search engine.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

its also the reason why in the U.S, the default messaging app is the most used. people are lazy unless forced to be given the option at the start.

[–] LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org -1 points 1 month ago

Many people don't even know what continent they live on and you expect them to switch web browsers?

[–] 7ai@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Okay. I have purged Google chrome from my devices long ago.

[–] netizen@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I can't. Firefox on Android doesn't handle my personal certificate so it's a hassle to access gov sites

[–] 7ai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

In that case you can try cromite for Android. It's a decent private and ad blocking browser based on chromium.

[–] femtech@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] netizen@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

That's to add an "authority". Done that. But firefox doesn't find a personal (id) cert signed by that CA (fnmt.es)

[–] mm_maybe@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I already know that nobody will mention Vivaldi, or if they do, they will be drowned out by a chorus of voices shouting "Firefox", but if you like the chromium ecosystem or just don't like waiting for web pages to function, it's a great alternative with a built-in adblocker that doesn't depend on uBlock Origin.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Vivaldi is great. Sadly any mention of it gets downvoted by Firefox fanboys who don't understand we are on the same team.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Good thing I already stopped using chrome since about a year ag