this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
357 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

59594 readers
3330 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kaitco@lemmy.world 89 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My Jellyfin just quivered…

[–] PHLAK@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’ve been looking to buy a couple 24TB drives. Hopefully, this pushes their price down.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Peertube instance owners rejoice!

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Or just people who download porn.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Who doesn't have multiple TB of videos just laying around?

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] idunnololz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wish there were TBs of porn of what I was into.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

If porn was just created on demand instead of filling millions of hdd's, would anyone notice or care? Finally a use for generative AI.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I prefer 1980s porn jpgs around 90kB each thankyouverymuch.

It's crazy sizes though uf you think about it, I have like 2 or 4 TB drives and they are far from full.

[–] Longpork3 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

When will it be commercially available though? Supposedly Seagate has had 30TB drives out for the better part of a year, but I can't find anything larger than 24TB actually available for purchase.

[–] Pyotr@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I've been waiting for a 32TB to become available as well, Seagate announced that drive last year and it's still not available outside data centers. I suspect the WD one will be the same.

[–] dan@upvote.au 5 points 1 month ago

I'd guess that they're commercially available but only for hyperscalers - large companies like Google, Amazon (AWS), etc that need a huge amount of storage.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Obligatory hint that SMR isn't suited for RAID systems.

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

A better way to word it is: SMR is only suited for archival usage. Large writes, little-to-no random writes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wonder what happens if you throw them in an unraid BTRFS/jbod configuration with a CMR parity drive.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

Slowdown and data corruption?

[–] ninth_plane@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Tape on a platter, basically.

[–] addie@feddit.uk 26 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Assuming that these have fairly impressive 100 MB/s sustained write speed, then it's going to take about 93 hours to write the whole contents of the disk - basically four days. That's a long time to replace a failed drive in a RAID array; you'd need to consider multiple disks of redundancy just in case another one fails while you're resilvering the first.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 11 points 1 month ago

This is one of the reasons I use unRAID with two parity disks. If one fails, I'll still have access to my data while I rebuild the data on the replacement drive.

Although, parity checks with these would take forever, of course..

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's a pretty common failure scenario in SANs. If you buy a bunch of drives, they're almost guaranteed to come from the same batch, meaning they're likely to fail around the same time. The extra load of a rebuild can kill drives that are already close to failure.

Which is why SANs have hot spares that can be allocated instantly on failure. And you should use a RAID level with enough redundancy to meet your reliability needs. And RAID is not backup, you should have backups too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Ugurcan@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (5 children)

If you eyeballing these, please remind that these babies tend to be LOUD AS FUCK, so might not be suitable for home server use.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Are they any louder than any HDD from the last 30 years?

If so, im actually curious why that is

Edit: fixed to say HDD not SSD

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Well I have no experience with these particular drives, but they do seem to have 11 platters. Which is beyond insane as far as I'm concerned. More platters means more moving parts, more friction more noise (all other things being equal).

[–] Ugurcan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Oops, yes. I definitely would expect these to be much louder than your 6 GB 1998 model HDD wrangling under stress of copying files at 30 MB/s.

[–] Onsotumenh@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tell that to my IBM 10GB 10.000 RPM U2W SCSI from back then. To this day I have never witnessed a noisier harddrive... But that PC was pretty epic, including the biggest mf of a mainboard I ever had (the SCSI controller was onboard).

[–] varyingExpertise@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

Ah, the sound of turning on the SCSI storage tower.

KA-TSCHONK. WeeeeeeeeEEEEEIIIIIII... skrrrt, skrrrt, clack.

Either that or KA-TSCHONK, silence, if there were already too many boxes on that circuit at a lan party 😁

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Just don't put it in your bedroom. All those dead skin cells wouldn't do good to it anyway.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Since when is dust a concern for hard drives??

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

I was talking about the server in general

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Drives like this are hermetically sealed with an inert gas like argon or helium on the inside. Even the presence of oxygen and nitrogen molecules can compromise the drive. If dust is getting to the moving parts of your hard drive, it's toast no matter where it's installed.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Parity rebuild will only take a week....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Toes@ani.social 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My 6TB drive just died. So I'm in the market for a new one.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

sorry but these aren't 6TB

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Mebbe the 26 one is just 3-4 smaller drives inside it?

[–] Anti_Face_Weapon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You joke but that's sorta how it works for some HDDs lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

this is great news! I'm running low on space on my 20tb now.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›