this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
929 points (85.0% liked)

Political Memes

5358 readers
3165 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RatzChatsubo@lemm.ee 27 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

People get weird close to the election.

People voting green party did so for a reason. Not everyone fits into perfectly shaped boxes for the 2 party system. Many vote 3rd party for leverage for policy change. The narrative of picking the lesser evil doesn't always apply to the narrative of the individual voter.

[–] electricyarn@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Did people who voted for Stein get what they wanted by electing Trump?

[–] Matombo@feddit.org 1 points 10 hours ago

They did manage that the democrats will never run with hilary again -> If both choices in the current election are shit you can at least try to influence the next one.

Also fuck 'muricas election system. Everything resulting in a 2 Party system is no real democracy.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

No, they got what they wanted by bringing third party candidates to the discussion table so more people would vote third party in future elections.

One day we might even be able to elect a candidate who isn't the "lesser evil"

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

One day we might even be able to elect a candidate who isn’t the “lesser evil”

Literally impossible in the US unless one of two things happen. Either:

  1. Both the current major parties fracture, and the resulting two parties that will occur thereafter align themselves on axes that are dissimilar to the ones that the current two parties are aligned on, or

  2. Laws are passed to remove FPTP and winner take all so that not voting for a Republican or Democrat has an actual influence on the vote.

The current system in the US is statistically proven to result in two majority parties controlling the government. The only effect that voting third-party does now is to spoil the votes for the majority-party candidate most closely aligned with that third-party.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

One day we might get stv approval voting instant runoff or one of the methods that allow 3rd parties to win push for that at the state level instead of fantasies that can never work

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

We are literally vote in a Hitler figure who is going to build concentration camps and wreck the country or stick with sanity. The lesser of two evils is necessary until the second major party stops running Hitler.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] _lilith@lemmy.world 41 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Ranked choice voting eliminates the concept of spoiler candidates/parties.

You are correct. Also, OP is correct.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The duopoly of power won't add ranked choice voting

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

People said this about weed. We literally had two states add it in like the last 10 years. Once a few more states pass RCV via initiative we'll start seeing legislatures take it up on their own.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] febra@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Then maybe Kamala should stop glazing Israel's d. so much and actually do something to win back michigan muslims. They'll either vote third party or won't vote at all. The trumpists will vote Trump anyway. This post is purely delusional if you think you'll win some voting groups back just by dragging third party candidates through the mud. Especially voting groups so deeply involved in some issues that your beloved candidate clearly doesn't care about at all.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 44 points 22 hours ago (8 children)

I might risk voting 3rd party if this election wasn't a choice between boring corporatists and 100% concentrated evil.

The stakes are just too damn high to risk letting Trump get back into the White House again.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Honesty is refreshing. I’m voting for Harris because I don’t want to see Trump’s orange face every week. Yes, I know what she is. Yes, I know what that makes me. I’ve made my peace with it. No, I don’t blame others who feel differently.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

I've always critiqued the democrats but I'm so tired of trump. I will vote for a thousand boring democrats if it means removing these entitled, lying MAGA idiots from anything resembling power. They all belong in lunatic asylums, not in government.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

it's not worth it until first past the post is removed.

Until then it's mathematically impossible for a third party candidate to win. Focus your energy instead on removing first past the post, then you have a chance

[–] Gurei@sh.itjust.works 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The only time I went third party it wasn't to win. It was because I saw it as two main candudates so shirty that there was a good chance for third party to snag more voters than usual, possibly enough to gain slightly better recognition in the future.

The monkey's paw curled.

We got Trump. The recognition came as irrational blame for Trump.

I won't make the same mistake of voting for someone I think would do the best job. Now it's merely an effort to keep the worst viable candidate out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

This is the way.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AidsKitty@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Dont let online bullies influence your vote. Each citizen gets one vote, cast it for whom you wish to support. Learn about the issues, the policies being proposed, and cast your vote for whomever you support.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Godric@lemmy.world 16 points 23 hours ago

G.R.E.E.N.

GET

REPUBLICANS

ELECTED

EVERY

NOVEMBER

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (17 children)

That makes an assumption that all or a big majority third party voters would prefer Harris over Trump.

Just for clarifying the logic here.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Jill Stein is a fascist bitch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (4 children)

These numbers are ~~not~~ correct according to NY Times

Edit: I can’t math

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If this were true then American politics really are terrible. Minority should hold seats. America needs to revisit representation.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It’s actually not entirely true, it only counts stein as the only 3rd party (the libertarian candidate in PA got 3x as many votes as her, I’d bet those 3rd party votes wouldn’t have gone to Clinton) AND doesn’t report factual numbers.

It’s just not true.

That said unfortunately voting for a 3rd party candidate is largely useless in the USA and the forces trying to get their opponents voters to vote 3rd party are probably more overwhelming then the forces actually compelling folks to vote 3rd party.

FPTP needs to die in the USA.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›