this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
777 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

58790 readers
2835 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5paceThunder@lemmy.ca 23 points 23 hours ago

Lol, Elon is the new Trump, what a mooch. Take away message, Never do business with these types, you will never get paid.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Soooo noone here even read the article? Just see Elon and start shitting everywhere? The company suing X was dealing with Twitter before Elon. There was no purchasing contract in place when the suing company placed the $20 million dollar order they are claiming is all custom made and cant be recouped, "the social media platform had not made any firm purchase order when the server dealer went ahead with its purchases and deliveries."

How about we read an article before we start spewing shit everywhere?

[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

There was no purchasing contract in place when the suing company placed the $20 million dollar order they are claiming is all custom made and cant be recouped, "the social media platform had not made any firm purchase order when the server dealer went ahead with its purchases and deliveries."

You're leaving out that the paragraph you're summarizing starts off with "X claims that."

One side says there was a contract. The other side says it wasn't firmed up yet into a binding contract. Neither side has come forward with their evidence.

Also, Wiwynn is also suing for negligent misrepresentation and promissory estoppel, which don't require a contract.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 0 points 57 minutes ago

So read my other comment and cited quote pulled right from the fuckin court documents and reported on by MSN. Fuckint hell. It's in every fucking article I've searched. The suing company isn't going off anything but fucking assumptions.

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 17 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

When you read the article, it also points to another article that goes further into this case.

...in 2014 it contracted with Twitter to provide "unique, custom-designed IT infrastructure products including rack solutions."...

Seems it was already approved in 2014 for such a long-term relationship in writing. It seems that Elon just didn't want to pay for it even though Twitter was contractual bound to pay.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world -1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Which is the whole point. If they had 1 email, 1 PO, 1 documented proof of agreement, this would never be a fuckin court case. What is more likely, that X is risking liability for the $20M + legal costs in court trying to renege $20M down to $18M? All this suing company has to do, as I stated above, is show one acknowledgment and confirmation between the two parties and its an open and close case.

There was a judge (I'm going off memory from hearing it on the radio a year or so ago) in Canada who held a farmer liable for responding to a text with a thumbs up to a contractor asking if he got the contract he sent the farmer. Farmer went into court with the defense he was acknowledging that he received the text but it wasn't enough to convince beyond reasonable doubt there wasn't an understanding between the two.

If Twitter and Elon were trying to weasel out of paying this company, THEY WOULD BE SUING THEM for some made up breech of contract BS like they're doing to advertisers.

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

They have one, the contract signed in 2014. As is mentioned in the quote I shared.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world -4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Contracted =/= Court approved documentation

Ever heard of a verbal contract? It's a legally binding agreement unless everyone from the contracted party was fired and you don't have any fucking proof of the conversations with people no longer employed by the company you are suing.

So for the third time THE COMPANY SUING DOESNT HAVE THE PROPER DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THERE WAS A PURCHASING AGREEMENT. THATS WHY THEYRE SUING AND NOT GOING FOR A SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Like what the fuck are you even arguing for or against? That this company is going thru this expensive and lengthy court process to get judgment for the money they are owed for shits and giggles?

Here is another article that says they assumed Twitter accepted liability:

The complaint also says that Wiwynn, which makes servers and storage systems for data centers and cloud providers, had amassed $120 million worth of parts to fulfill Twitter's existing orders, under the assumption that Twitter had taken liability for them.

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 1 points 2 minutes ago

Again, they have a court approved document. As per the lawsuit filing:

Recognizing the value of Wiwynn’s custom-tailored solutions, on September 24, 2014, X Corp. entered into a Master Purchase Agreement with Wiwynn. For nearly eight years, X Corp. sourced and Wiwynn provided unique, custom-designed IT infrastructure products including rack solutions for X Corp.’s data centers, based on forecasts provided by X Corp. The components used to build the products are largely unique to the products, resulting in long lead times for ordering such component parts from suppliers. To ensure that products could be manufactured on the strict timeline X Corp. required, X Corp. specifically gave written approval for Wiwynn to purchase the necessary components to manufacture the custom products being made for X Corp., and expressly assumed liability for the procurement costs.

And a master purchase agreement is a legally binding contract.

[–] FatCrab@lemmy.one 5 points 2 hours ago

Summary judgement is not a thing separate from a lawsuit. It's literally a standard filling made in nearly every lawsuit (even if just as a hail mary). You referenced "beyond a reasonable doubt" earlier. This is also not the standard used in (US) civil cases--it's typically a standard consisting of the preponderance of the evidence.

I'm also not sure what you mean by "court approved documentation." Different jurisdictions approach contract law differently, but courts don't "approve" most contracts--parties allege there was a binding and contractual agreement, present their evidence to the court, and a mix of judge and jury determines whether under the jurisdictions laws and enforceable agreement occurred and how it can be enforced (i.e., are the obligations severable, what damages, etc.).

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

There was no purchasing contract in place when the suing company placed the $20 million dollar order

You think that companies just slap down 20mil without a contract in place?

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Hahaha yeah otherwise they wouldn't be trying to sue to recoup losses. It happens all the time in sales. I can't even tell you the amount of times I have told new sales reps, I will not place anticipatory PO's without payment confirmation or full compliance with not just the purchase order's parameters for payment on large orders but also an email or otherwise documented acknowledgment of our sales order confirmation. Especially in any case where:

  1. The sales rep has a PO from customer but no payment confirmation/information OR

  2. If it's an order over, let's say $10,000 OR

  3. If it's the first time customer is purchasing from us and they want to make a blanket order OR

  4. If they're an international customer placing ANY orders over $500, or have seperate countries for billing and shipping address, or they're shipping to a country on our "fuck shipping to these countries" list

All those scenarios happen and happen often. Theyre not 100% of nepharious lost revenue cases but I'd say they make up 80-90% of the shit companies have sitting on a warehouse top shelf. Only getting moved to make room for other stuff.

Any business doing fabrications or custom fuckin anything, also will 100% of the time have a signed drawing or print, payment in full before it's released to production floor, usually a +/- 5% runoff or shorting stipulation for any qty over 1,000-3,000 custom anything, and constant communication through out the entire process.

For this exact very real very common shit storm.

So and so's cnc machine broke down we can only make 1,000 of the 10,000 you ordered.

It was a government contract to redo the electrical work at Governor Cuomo's house, how should I know he was going to be removed from office?

Everything this lawsuit outlines, fuckkn screams new business, 1st large contract. All the need is one email, one purchase order, fuck even just a sales order from Twitter and they wouldn't ever make it close to a court house before the Twitter boardmembers looked at the liability, the legal costs and the very slim liklihood they would come out better than if they paid the $20 million. And anyone who argues that $20 Million is enough to try and skip out on and risk letting it go to court has no fucking idea to the quantifiable difference between $20 million and $8-$20 Billion (what im guessing Twitter is still worth assuming it was about $40B when Elon bought and estimates have it between 50% and 80% the value when it sold. Even at the middle $14B, $20M is only 0.14285714% of $14B. No that's not a mistake the decimal is where it should be lol. Check it by multiplying $14B*0.0014285714

[–] Entropywins@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

Wywinn is a 12 year old $7 billion in revenue cloud infrastructure provider (originally a subsidiary of Wistron Corp) and represents 10-15% of worldwide server procurement...they are pretty serious and come from a very serious business background.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

How about we read an article before we start spewing shit everywhere?

Good luck lol. The top comments are almost always people that didn't actually read the article, just the headline. I see it on practically all social media sites, not just Lemmy.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world -5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If you've been in IT since '98 you ought to know this isn't a social media site lol. It's a social forum for communities of users with like minded interests. Most daily social media users get weeded by any UI that isn't 1-3 giant app buttons to sign you into everything on every device you ever did and will own.

Lol plus not many people here are absolute fucking psychos like you with your Lemmy profile pic hahaha fuck you are a madman lol.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 12 hours ago

Forums are social media, especially so for sites like Reddit and Lemmy where the subforums are community-created.

Wikipedia:

Social media are interactive technologies that facilitate the creation, sharing and aggregation of content (such as ideas, interests, and other forms of expression) amongst virtual communities and networks.

Merriam-Webster:

forms of electronic communication (such as websites for social networking and microblogging) through which users create online communities to share information, ideas, personal messages, and other content (such as videos)

Britannica:

forms of electronic communication (such as Web sites) through which people create online communities to share information, ideas, personal messages, etc.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 16 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Strip "Leon" of his US citizenship, use a court order to take the money from his account and ship his Dork MAGA ass off to Moscow or Johannesburg.

[–] Tire@lemmy.ml 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Could you imagine how upset Republicans would be if some random Mexican immigrant used $61m of resources and didn’t pay? But if it’s a rich white guy that owes that much they are fine with it.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago
[–] Baggins@feddit.uk 82 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's how his Department Of Government Efficiency will save billions.

[–] shinratdr@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

Which is what Trump wants, as he also publicly admits he just doesn’t pay bills if he doesn’t feel like it.

Looking forward to all the lawsuits between the two should he lose.

[–] interurbain1er@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Seems aligned with Trump's habit of shafting his sub-contractors.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 73 points 1 day ago
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 160 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Never give these rich assholes credit unless there is an airtight contract for payment.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 150 points 1 day ago (14 children)

There is no such thing as an airtight contract when dealing with Musk. He simply ignores it until you sue.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 112 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same thing as Trump.

Doesn't matter how perfect your contract is, as long as they can afford to fight the lawsuit longer than you you're gonna lose.

You'd think people would learn to not contract with these assholes at all.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 15 points 1 day ago

You just have to work in legal costs to anything you do. Call it an asshole tax

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Payment up front, in non negotiable bearer bonds.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 day ago

Never give these rich assholes credit ~~unless there is an airtight contract for payment~~.

[–] pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Cash on delivery is extremely rare in the business world, especially when dealing with enterprise customers. While I have no doubt many of Twitter's vendors have recently switched to COD, that is not the norm.

These types of relationships typically work on anywhere from 30 to 90 day terms, depending on the vendor, client, and their history.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 day ago

Paying bills is for poor people. Rich people don’t need to do that. How would they stay rich?

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 112 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“Your Honor, the board voted to pay this guy a salary of nearly that amount - per day. If it would please the court, fuck this guy and the board and please make them pay their bills.”

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] _core@sh.itjust.works 86 points 1 day ago (7 children)
[–] rsuri@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

X/Twitter has its own data centers, this is for physical equipment under X's control. They need to get a judgment (which the article indicates they're working on) before they can do anything. Presumably after months to years of litigation they can then repossess the servers, but then X would probably at the last minute pay the bill.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

They ship servers to customers, don't think they have access anymore.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago

Didn't he just donate 75 mil towards fascism? But can't pay his bills...

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They should seize and sell his private jet.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You misspelled "harvest" and "organs".

[–] swab148@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Harvest his private organs? No one wants those.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›