this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
806 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

58790 readers
2872 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5paceThunder@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 day ago

Lol, Elon is the new Trump, what a mooch. Take away message, Never do business with these types, you will never get paid.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Strip "Leon" of his US citizenship, use a court order to take the money from his account and ship his Dork MAGA ass off to Moscow or Johannesburg.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

off to Moscow

Only if China or America are willing to receive Pu's ass.

[–] Tire@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Could you imagine how upset Republicans would be if some random Mexican immigrant used $61m of resources and didn’t pay? But if it’s a rich white guy that owes that much they are fine with it.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago
[–] Baggins@feddit.uk 87 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's how his Department Of Government Efficiency will save billions.

[–] shinratdr@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

Which is what Trump wants, as he also publicly admits he just doesn’t pay bills if he doesn’t feel like it.

Looking forward to all the lawsuits between the two should he lose.

[–] interurbain1er@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Seems aligned with Trump's habit of shafting his sub-contractors.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Soooo noone here even read the article? Just see Elon and start shitting everywhere? The company suing X was dealing with Twitter before Elon. There was no purchasing contract in place when the suing company placed the $20 million dollar order they are claiming is all custom made and cant be recouped, "the social media platform had not made any firm purchase order when the server dealer went ahead with its purchases and deliveries."

How about we read an article before we start spewing shit everywhere?

[–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

Wtf "cant be recouped" means for servers?

[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

There was no purchasing contract in place when the suing company placed the $20 million dollar order they are claiming is all custom made and cant be recouped, "the social media platform had not made any firm purchase order when the server dealer went ahead with its purchases and deliveries."

You're leaving out that the paragraph you're summarizing starts off with "X claims that."

One side says there was a contract. The other side says it wasn't firmed up yet into a binding contract. Neither side has come forward with their evidence.

Also, Wiwynn is also suing for negligent misrepresentation and promissory estoppel, which don't require a contract.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world -3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So read my other comment and cited quote pulled right from the fuckin court documents and reported on by MSN. Fuckint hell. It's in every fucking article I've searched. The suing company isn't going off anything but fucking assumptions.

[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 5 points 4 hours ago

pulled right from the fuckin court documents

The "court documents" are filings by the parties. You're summarizing litigation documents filed by Twitter, in a motion to dismiss, which is a phase of litigation before either side comes forward with any evidence.

The court hasn't ruled on anything, so you're just repeating statements that one side has claimed. I'm pointing out that the other side is claiming the opposite.

The suing company isn't going off anything but fucking assumptions.

They're not required to come forward with evidence (and litigation procedure doesn't even give them much of an opportunity to come forward with evidence at this stage). What they have come forward with is literally sealed by the court, so unless you're leaking confidential court documents you don't have any idea of what they're claiming. Take a look at the docket.

If you're going to be aggressive in this comment section, at least learn the very basics of the thing you're being aggressive about. It's clear you don't know the basics of this type of litigation, so it might help if you show some intellectual humility, take a step back, and let the knowledgeable people actually weigh in, to be able to evaluate the publicly filed documents in an informed way. Whatever it is you're doing instead, looks pretty bad.

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 20 points 1 day ago (5 children)

When you read the article, it also points to another article that goes further into this case.

...in 2014 it contracted with Twitter to provide "unique, custom-designed IT infrastructure products including rack solutions."...

Seems it was already approved in 2014 for such a long-term relationship in writing. It seems that Elon just didn't want to pay for it even though Twitter was contractual bound to pay.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

There was no purchasing contract in place when the suing company placed the $20 million dollar order

You think that companies just slap down 20mil without a contract in place?

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Hahaha yeah otherwise they wouldn't be trying to sue to recoup losses. It happens all the time in sales. I can't even tell you the amount of times I have told new sales reps, I will not place anticipatory PO's without payment confirmation or full compliance with not just the purchase order's parameters for payment on large orders but also an email or otherwise documented acknowledgment of our sales order confirmation. Especially in any case where:

  1. The sales rep has a PO from customer but no payment confirmation/information OR

  2. If it's an order over, let's say $10,000 OR

  3. If it's the first time customer is purchasing from us and they want to make a blanket order OR

  4. If they're an international customer placing ANY orders over $500, or have seperate countries for billing and shipping address, or they're shipping to a country on our "fuck shipping to these countries" list

All those scenarios happen and happen often. Theyre not 100% of nepharious lost revenue cases but I'd say they make up 80-90% of the shit companies have sitting on a warehouse top shelf. Only getting moved to make room for other stuff.

Any business doing fabrications or custom fuckin anything, also will 100% of the time have a signed drawing or print, payment in full before it's released to production floor, usually a +/- 5% runoff or shorting stipulation for any qty over 1,000-3,000 custom anything, and constant communication through out the entire process.

For this exact very real very common shit storm.

So and so's cnc machine broke down we can only make 1,000 of the 10,000 you ordered.

It was a government contract to redo the electrical work at Governor Cuomo's house, how should I know he was going to be removed from office?

Everything this lawsuit outlines, fuckkn screams new business, 1st large contract. All the need is one email, one purchase order, fuck even just a sales order from Twitter and they wouldn't ever make it close to a court house before the Twitter boardmembers looked at the liability, the legal costs and the very slim liklihood they would come out better than if they paid the $20 million. And anyone who argues that $20 Million is enough to try and skip out on and risk letting it go to court has no fucking idea to the quantifiable difference between $20 million and $8-$20 Billion (what im guessing Twitter is still worth assuming it was about $40B when Elon bought and estimates have it between 50% and 80% the value when it sold. Even at the middle $14B, $20M is only 0.14285714% of $14B. No that's not a mistake the decimal is where it should be lol. Check it by multiplying $14B*0.0014285714

[–] Entropywins@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Wywinn is a 12 year old $7 billion in revenue cloud infrastructure provider (originally a subsidiary of Wistron Corp) and represents 10-15% of worldwide server procurement...they are pretty serious and come from a very serious business background.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 76 points 1 day ago
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 167 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Never give these rich assholes credit unless there is an airtight contract for payment.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 154 points 1 day ago (14 children)

There is no such thing as an airtight contract when dealing with Musk. He simply ignores it until you sue.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 116 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same thing as Trump.

Doesn't matter how perfect your contract is, as long as they can afford to fight the lawsuit longer than you you're gonna lose.

You'd think people would learn to not contract with these assholes at all.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 15 points 1 day ago

You just have to work in legal costs to anything you do. Call it an asshole tax

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Payment up front, in non negotiable bearer bonds.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 day ago

Never give these rich assholes credit ~~unless there is an airtight contract for payment~~.

[–] pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Cash on delivery is extremely rare in the business world, especially when dealing with enterprise customers. While I have no doubt many of Twitter's vendors have recently switched to COD, that is not the norm.

These types of relationships typically work on anywhere from 30 to 90 day terms, depending on the vendor, client, and their history.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 day ago

Paying bills is for poor people. Rich people don’t need to do that. How would they stay rich?

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 114 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“Your Honor, the board voted to pay this guy a salary of nearly that amount - per day. If it would please the court, fuck this guy and the board and please make them pay their bills.”

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Your honor, rather than pay his outstanding debts, this shiftless f***wit used 75 million dollars to fund a SuperPAC to bother people at their homes for the benefit of the Trump campaign."

Different board. That was Tesla, not Twitter.

[–] _core@sh.itjust.works 88 points 1 day ago (7 children)
[–] rsuri@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

X/Twitter has its own data centers, this is for physical equipment under X's control. They need to get a judgment (which the article indicates they're working on) before they can do anything. Presumably after months to years of litigation they can then repossess the servers, but then X would probably at the last minute pay the bill.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

They ship servers to customers, don't think they have access anymore.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago

Didn't he just donate 75 mil towards fascism? But can't pay his bills...

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They should seize and sell his private jet.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You misspelled "harvest" and "organs".

[–] swab148@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Harvest his private organs? No one wants those.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›