this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
580 points (89.3% liked)

Political Memes

5391 readers
3546 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 127 points 5 days ago (3 children)

A few more days. Please, just gotta hold off a week and a half. After that, I can shift gears from "Fuck's sake please just support the non-fascist candidate against the literal fascist" to "These are the problems in this fucking country and they need to be addressed, and fuck Harris if she doesn't"

Just spare us an immediate future of fascism. Buy yourselves, and ourselves, more time to work. Even if you think this is ONLY buying time, buy it. Because things are NOT going to be easier to organize under a fascist regime - and the idea that the more people suffer, the more they're inclined towards your, specific, political views, is just not borne out by reality.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 56 points 5 days ago (9 children)

Third parties have some valid ideas and I don’t oppose voting them in down ballot to create an alternative to the two main parties.

But voting for them as presidential candidates right now means that I’m effectively voting against my ideals.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 32 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Until third parties have a presence at the national level it’s stupid to vote for one for president.

If you think Democratic presidents don’t get anything done with a Republican Congress just wait until both sides of both houses refuse to work with a third party president.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is what I've been saying. Even if a third party somehow managed to win the Presidency, they still can't do anything if Congress doesn't play ball. And knowing Congress, they're not going to. There's zero base for a third party President to stand on because none have made the effort to win seats in the House and Senate.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

And that's not even taking into account the judges who get to rule on things, who have all been appointed by one of the two parties. Even if Congress works with them a judge can just throw it out.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Voting dems down ballot is just as important. Don't be a fool.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

I do think it depends on where you live. In about half of states, your vote for president is meaningless. Mississippi isn't going blue and Massachusetts isn't going red. In those cases, voting third party has the chance to effect future federal election funding.

But yeah, if you're in a state with literally any chance at all of being a toss up, don't vote 3rd party.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

It's selection bias on their part, they'll point to the fall of the Tsar and say "see, see, revolution comes from oppression!", and ignore what happened to the communists in Germany, lol.

They really have a hard-on for violent revolution, when peaceful revolution may still be an option...

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 25 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I can’t wait to talk about this country’s shit healthcare again from November 6, 2024 thru April, 2028.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 51 points 5 days ago

For anyone who honestly believes in third party stuff: try supporting ranked voting at the local and state level. Once we have more ranked voting at local and state levels, it will be easier to push that at the federal level, which is the best way to solve strategic voting problems in presidential elections.

Nobody would support ranked voting for presidential elections if that's the first time they hear about it. But if people use it already in local elections, and see that it works better, then extending it to presidential elections is a logic choice.

[–] anas@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (11 children)

~~I’m not American~~

I’ve seen this meme shared going back to “3 months before the election”. When people have been protesting for way longer than that, and not only have they been ignored, but silenced, I’m not surprised when they turn to more drastic measures to be heard.

EDIT: well, this makes sense, it was you who posted the previous memes lol

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Ranked is better than our current system, but it still has a lot of flaws. Approval and STAR are better systems.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Lemmy.ml is all about this right now. The idiots... They claim to want things to lean more left, then they help the right with their narrative.

Ever since coming here (Lemmy) I've started to develop a solid bias against the far left. They are defeating their own goals when they do this shit.

For the record, I'm independent but I vote blue because the GOP is insane.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t call ml far left.

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

if marxist-leninists aren't far left who is?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Anarchists and similar are actually left.

MLs ar largely authoritarian cultists who self-identify as followers of dead white bros from hundreds of years ago. They're not leftists. Many are right-wing "red fash".

They're all "tankies" to this crowd sadly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

That’s auth left.

[–] SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

ngl, feels like holding in the worst fart. Can't wait to start complaining again!

load more comments
view more: next ›