454

Almost as good as Lichtman's keys!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] zenharbinger@lemmy.world 270 points 2 years ago

48% of these kids frighten me.

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 228 points 2 years ago

Nah, it's just kids parroting their parents views. I did the same thing as a child, and I'm about as far left as you can get as an adult.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 2 years ago

Well in that case, 48% still frightens me.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 years ago

Don't worry. It all comes down to the hands of like 100k voters in a few random swing states.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] flicker@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

The thing about this is, I was a kid in 1996 when Bill Clinton ran against Bob Dole.

Our whole elementary school had a big educational event about the election. Bob Dole and Bill Clinton both sent personalized videos to our schools, explaining what they stood for, and we had a mock election.

My grade overwhelmingly went for Bill Clinton. (I want to say, he had a very easy-to-understand platform regarding the importance of education, and the impact it would have on us, the future electorate. And Bob Dole was... Bob Dole.)

Did I mention I grew up in a very Roman Catholic, very hardcore Republican house? That I grew up in Oklahoma, a red state?

I wasn't the only kid standing up to my parents over the results!

I guess what I'm saying is, if the children are aware, and still choosing Trump, we need to know why. Kids don't have a problem voting against their parents, as long as they understand the issues. And if they don't understand the role they play in their country, we should be extending further education.

I really think that we are failing our children. Our educational system is disgraceful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 205 points 2 years ago

But was that enough to win the Nickelodeon's Kids Electoral College?

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 112 points 2 years ago

It wouldn't be an electoral college in this case. It would be an electoral... middle school?

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 2 years ago

Take your upvote and leave.

[-] stoicmaverick@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

They're still looking into it. There is currently some debate about some 'hanging Cheetos' and they're going to ask Mom and Dad to clarify some wording.

[-] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Helga Pataki* is demanding they recount Florida

*No I cannot make a more current Nickelodeon reference

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 174 points 2 years ago

That 48% makes me so fucking sad...

[-] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 98 points 2 years ago

It’s mostly kids mimicking their parents feelings. Which is not the MOST sad. But still not great.

[-] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think this is much sadder than just the parents thinking like this. Kids should get to be kids and start their lives unencumbered by their parents' hatred and bitterness.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Had some people in a duel enrollment (collage level) class tell me last Friday that they'd vote for trump because "he's an asshole but I like his policies"

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago

Don't worry, at the collage level they're just bringing a bunch of pictures together

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Intergalactic@lemmy.world 113 points 2 years ago

48% to Trump is embarrassing. This country is failing our children.

[-] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago

Unfortunately kids parrot the hate and political leanings of their parents until they grow older at least

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Really shows where the problem lies. Indoctrination. Results not much different than the national poll.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] catbum@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The worst part is knowing that they're (most likely) just listening to the loudest voter in their household even if other opinions manage to exist in their family.

I only remembered my dad talking about Bush or scoffing at this or that "donkey" thing so I thought it was Bush and the elephants I was supposed to like. I know I would have voted as such in something like this because I didn't know any better at 6-8 years old, although I'm not finding the kids' age ranges in this mock election. Anyway, I still didn't know any better in junior high, I remember voting for Bush again in a 7th grade social studies poll on the 2004 elections. I recall the teacher saying even the results amongst one class were usually a pretty accurate reflection of the actual election results, right down to the goob who voted for Nader.

It took me going to college in the purplest damn section of a pretty red state for me to come to terms with what I actually believed and felt about people and politics. Further education was definitely key, and intertwined with that, it opened me up to people. Just talking to people in an environment where you're all on essentially the same operating level day to day is huge.

My dad kept doing his thing in the small town where everyone knew everyone and somehow managed to sleep with everyone, too. He turned into a Trumper. I did my thing and I admit, it took me a lot of those four years of working on projects and getting pissed about loans together but really just enjoying life with a modestly diverse, pretty tolerant student body (still a lot of white raised-as-protestant types) to undo the damage of a conservatively skewed and Catholic childhood. But I can tell you that by 2014 I was annoyed at myself for not caring about the 2012 election, this first time I could vote. And you can guess I most certainly never even considered supporting Trump or any of the terrible things he represents when he suddenly-to-me showed up.

Would it make any reasonable sense for my dad to go to college at his age? No, probably not. But how do we get people to "simply" live around and be exposed to more people with relatively little prejudice in social status?

Do we just ... Idk where I'm going with this I got high but wait just a tick here did I just reason myself into communism ^fuckity^^shit^

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 105 points 2 years ago

When Harris wins she needs to weaponize the military against the children who chose Trump. It's only fair.

[-] jared@mander.xyz 50 points 2 years ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 25 points 2 years ago

Imagine the shitstorm if she would've said that instead of Trump.

[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Imagine the shit storm of she wasn't completely on-the-ball at every second of the campaign.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 70 points 2 years ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kids_Pick_the_President

"Since 1988, Kids Pick the President has accurately predicted the winner of each election with the exceptions of the 2004 and 2016 presidential elections."

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 96 points 2 years ago

Yeah, those two are not good ones to get wrong.

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 2 years ago

If it was 2000 and 2016 I'd be more concerned

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Maybe a little, but not much

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

In 2016 the kids favored Clinton by 17 points (36% Trump to 53% Clinton)

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 44 points 2 years ago

Those kids should have voted 3rd party instead of picking one of those two fascists.

/s

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They includes 3rd parties in 2016, but did not in 2020 and 2024, hence the different margins. And the 3rd party they included was of the Republican spoiler type rather than the Democratic spoiler type

They had way higher third party votes in their poll than actually occured - and the third party votes in 2016 were higher than usual (helping trump narrowly win in 2016)

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Well, that's scary.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago

Watch this be correct and nickelodeon replaces Nate Silver as the new polling god.

[-] mister_flibble@lemm.ee 31 points 2 years ago

Losing candidate gets slimed.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

What kind of f-ed up kid votes for Trump?

[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 years ago

The kind whose parents watch media that demonizes the Democrats.

[-] ECB@feddit.org 20 points 2 years ago

This is 90% just a proxy for how their parents will vote.

Its only a very small portion of kids that age who are going to have substantially different views than their parents (not that they don't exist!)

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago
[-] djsoren19@yiffit.net 32 points 2 years ago

100% of kids are dumb, 48% of them have Republican parents.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] antaymonkey@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

100% of kids are dumb. So far.

[-] Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 years ago

While I tend to agree, the only political news I got before I was 18 came from whatever news my parents had on the TV after dinner.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

Parents voting or telling the kids how to vote.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

So close? Sad.

[-] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Remember it's beneficial for the media when it's 50/50. Either by only promoting those stories or by skewing the numbers

[-] JPSound@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Thanks to the electoral elementary, Trump still wins another term in the principals office.

[-] VantaBrandon@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Well, at least we're consistently awful

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Trump is still kind of a meme candidate, so I think a lot of it might be that. Kamala is obviously better to someone that knows but she's also "boring"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

And the Dan Schneider feet award goes to...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
454 points (97.9% liked)

politics

31224 readers
3492 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS