this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
475 points (97.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9563 readers
759 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The new law permits pedestrians to cross a roadway at any point, including outside of a crosswalk. It also allows for crossing against traffic signals and specifically states that doing so is no longer a violation of the city’s administrative code. But the new law also warns that pedestrians crossing outside of a crosswalk do not have the right of way and that they should yield to other traffic that has the right of way.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

… it was illegal? No one has received a ticket for jaywalking in nyc.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

No white people maybe.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 46 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

How does one "legalize" walking? Jaywalking is an absurd concept to begin with.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 17 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Step 2. bring cars to the market before proper regulations were a thing
Step 3. aggressively lobby and market that it's the walkers fault for getting driven over
Step 4. actually win over public opinion somehow

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

There are plenty of places you're not allowed to walk for your own safety and the safety of others. It's not a crazy concept, although I do think that jaywalking should be legal

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 10 hours ago

Airports are so annoyingly difficult to walk around.

I prefer walking straight through, personally.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago

Step 1: be American

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 59 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"Jaywalking" being a crime is such a fundamentally brainrot thing

The law here in Brazil, not that anyone follows it, but it basically follows the logic of "the smaller you are, the more of a right of way you have". I.e. theoretically, a car should ALWAYS stop or slow itself to save a pedestrian or cyclist or even a motorcyclist

.... Again, not that anyone follows it, but it IS on the paper.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 10 hours ago

That's the same logic in the US. Except everyone yields to animals, because you can't tell a horse or a mule not to trample that person who walks next to them

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 5 points 17 hours ago

It would be nice if this was followed but the reality of the world is the opposite. It's right of weight, not right of way.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 12 points 22 hours ago

the term used here is "vulnerable". Vulnerability gives you priority

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Good, especially since the law just targets POC.

If car traffic became 50% worse to make walking traffic 5% better, that's a win for humans in the city. It'll help convince more people to use non-car methods of transportation and that helps spark people to vote for and invest in more non-car infrastructure.

Ditching cars in populated cities isn't a magic law or anything, it's a slow incremental burn; legalizing pedestrians walking strictly helps that

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 10 hours ago

Everything we do to make car travel worse (except for ambulances and disabled folks) is a win

[–] SatouKazuma@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago (16 children)

Ditching cars should be done everywhere (not just in populated cities).

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 15 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Agree, but it's certainly easier to do in NYC than rural places in the US, so I advocate for starting there

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] TheRealCharlesEames@lemm.ee 114 points 1 day ago (20 children)

Insane it was ever made illegal.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They were also fans of using it against left-wing protestors while ignoring the right doing it, particularly in the case of anti-genocide protests. I assume they will just find something new to pick people off in the crowd now.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 10 hours ago

Is disturbing the peace still a thing for them?

[–] Turbonics@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 16 hours ago

Jaycarring is the new trend

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

In 28 years living in New York, the vast majority of my crossing the street is done between the blocks. Some of them are very long.

And New Yorkers cross the street like we own it because we know that anyone who hits us is gonna get their ass sued off and have to pay out ridiculous amounts of money.

this really threw me when I first visited new york. I come from a place where you don't dare try that because you WILL get hit and the driver will likely get no consequences. seeing new yorkers just walk out into traffic without even looking was such a mindfuck

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›