Politics

There are multiple times where Jesus breaks with the established gender norms of the time.

Telling off the people about to stone the prostitute/adulterer to death would have been utterly shocking.

For starters... men and women were not supposed to be talking to each other in public, unless they were your family.

At the time, you basically needed two women to directly witness something... to be the equivalent of one man repeating hearsay, or claiming something with rather dubious evidence.

So... throwing himself into that situation... its actually so unbelievable that it would have played out as it did, that most non fundie scholars are almost certain it never happened... because Jesus most likely would have been beaten or killed.

If it is then a fictional story... the intent of adding it was clearly to indicate ... not as equal of a view of women as say a modern feminist, but a radically, radically progressive and more equal view for the time.

As to being against biased treatment of 'other', foreign groups of people?

Jesus again talks with a woman, in public, a Samaritan drawing water from a well.

This is an oversimplification, but basically Samaritans were viewed by many other Jews as ... not really Jews, as heretics, because they did not see the Temple in Jerusalem or its Rabbis as necessary or important to their version of Judaism.

Its... sort if analogous to how many modern Christians don't view Mormons as Christian, even though Mormons believe they are.

But its much more extreme than that. Samaritans and other Jews would often refuse to speak to each other, beat the shit out of each other, kill each other, be very very intolerant.

But Jesus just sees this 'foreign, heretical' woman as another person, says it does not matter whether you worship at the Temple or not, and attempts to convert her as respectfully as with anyone else.

He 'heals' women with bleeding disorders, in a socioreligious environment where a bleeding woman would have been seen as untouchable, who should basically either be banished from society or sequestered and only tended to by other women, who would have to ritually purify themselves after every encounter.

...

You are correct that examples of misogyny and racism do exist in the New Testament as well. Paul comes to mind for having a much more traditional view of women.

But, there absolutely are ways to cherry pick or emphasize the ... not as equal or progressive as modern views of equality and progress... but astoundingly more equal and progressive things Jesus did and said.

There absolutely are progressive churches that emphasize this.

You can interpret the totality of the Bible in many, many ways.