this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
129 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

58990 readers
4340 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thejml@lemm.ee 34 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

By “screen time” the article seems to assume the only thing they’re doing on their screens is social media. I had to check as if it was really just screens for more than 4hrs, that’s an interesting stat I hadn’t heard, but could make some sense. However, that’s not it. So doing things like content creation (drawing, writing, photography) reading or learning, aren’t counted in this study.

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 46 minutes ago* (last edited 46 minutes ago)

That's a big point that also usually isn't really distinguished in all these studies, especially the ones about children and screen time.

I feel there are differences between just watching cartoons and playing some involving game.

Also, just walking by a TV that's on is also screen time, or not? Is the TV running in the background at home screen time when you only look at it 5 minutes here and there?

I'd be happy if those studies would clearly state, 4 hours social media per day is bad. Or 4 hours watching TV with at least 30 minutes long sessions is bad. Stuff like that.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 14 points 9 hours ago

I'd be curious to know the relation between that and simply watching the news. Maybe it's not social media, or screen time, but simply being aware of the state of everything that is linked to anxiety and depression.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

In everyone, I would assume.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'm curious who's actually getting 4 or less hours per day?

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

My phone for today says 3 hours and i haven't watched any TV. So me I guess. Yesterday said 3.5 but I watched part of a baseball game so it probably totaled 4.5. I think most days I'd be under four hours of total screen time. I'd be under everyday for sure if we excepted reading. Moonreader+ has 2 of my three hours. The rest is feed reader and jerboa.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

4 more gigstons of CO~2~ in the atmosphere linked to more anxiety in people who might actually see 2100.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Just wait until everyone is forced to wear screens on their faces 24/7, because that's the way tech companies want us to live. I'm not being sarcastic, either.

There's a reason why so many people consciously choose to “disconnect” when they want a mental break. If we are no longer able to, how healthy do you think our society will be?

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

If we are no longer able to, how healthy do you think our society will be?

Tech CEOs: Who the fuck cares? I got my ad revenue, I couldn't care less about society. The shareholders sure seem happy!

[–] VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago

Are we sure there's not a balmer's peak scenario for the teens with 12-16 hour screen time?