this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
211 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19132 readers
4342 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

With the now-totally-legal-thanks-to-SCOTUS voter purging, theft and destruction of ballots, aggressive voter suppression tactics, and polling that indicates an electoral college but not population vote win for Trump, they might not have to 'Stop the Steal' at all. They've "legally" pre-stolen it themselves.

Instead of being concerned what the Republicans might do if they lose, it might be worth wondering if everybody else should really take it lying down like they did the 2000 election.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Last time, "stop the steal" failed because there wasn't any actual election fraud to be found. This time, there will be actual election fraud to find, and plenty of it, because they will have committed it themselves. They will then use their own crimes as an excuse to claim the vote tallies are unreliable and throw out entire precincts worth of results in Democrat-leaning areas. This will result in a claimed Trump win of both the electoral college and the popular vote in a landslide, and the MAGA SCOTUS will rubber-stamp it.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 20 points 6 hours ago

One of the many myriad things I hate about Trump is that he’s made presidential election season even longer with this sort of shit.

Usually this ends and I can enjoy the holidays, but no, I have to hear abiut this shit until fucking January.

Fuck him.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 50 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

No shit, they got a slap on the wrist last time.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 28 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Fucking fascist should of been hung. Biden had 4 Fucking years to protect our right to vote. They Fucking knew he was going do this. Hell they have been loud and proud of it. IF TRUMP STEALS THIS ELECTION I HOPE WE ARE READY TO RISE UP AND FIGHT BACK! ARE WE?

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 8 points 8 hours ago

General Strike can sometimes be the best thing for workers to do.

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml -4 points 4 hours ago

Yeah Democrats don't care if he wins...

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml -5 points 4 hours ago

But Democrats told me Trump is such a giant threat to democracy that we should all just show up and vote for them without hesitation after they spent three years doing nothing about his crimes

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 16 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Can someone explain why this is different from election interference?

You have people going away for years for stealing/destroying ballots, as they should.

But to throw away the result of millions of counted ballots seems like these low level interference x1000. How have they not faced dire consequences?

And yeah, I know, if its considered state level crimes (because states define tgeir own election rules), then it's local law enforcement, prosecutors, judges who look the other way because it's for their team.

But these seem to be major crimes with a clear record. How are they not locked away despite political alignment?

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 8 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

It's not, but you have a DOJ that is afraid of doing anything that might look 'political'. We know enough that this whole scheme was coordinated from the very top, but they slow walked the whole thing so we're now in the situation where Trump could get elected again and make the whole thing go away.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

It’s not, but you have a DOJ that is afraid of doing anything that might look ‘political’.

Which is itself political, and 100000000% corrupt.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Seeing as how people have already been indicted for this shit, knowing that this is potentially coming, I don't think they're going to have the same kid gloves on this time. And the orange stain isn't in power anymore. However we will see soon enough!

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

It's like Democrats don't care if Trump committed crimes

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 2 points 4 hours ago

Might be that they prefer doubling down on the pied piper strategy pioneered by Hillary.

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

They do, but the Democrats don’t enact justice. The DOJ does that, or is supposed to.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, I guess that's what I don't get. How can stealing/destroying ballots not be considered "political", but figuratively throwing out all of the ballots and unilaterally picking the winner be protected as "political".

It seems both are major crimes to democracy, whatever political party happened to commit said crimes.

Unless there's some grey area not explicitly addressed in law wrt electors.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 23 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

"Leave the door open"? It's literally their spoken and strategized plan for the election. How are things the Republicans have been loudly and obviously preparing for and putting in place for literally years "breaking news" days from the election? Democrats are so fucked.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 19 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Not just Democrats. The entire nation is fucked.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago

Oh cmon now. Don't be dramatic. Rich white guys will be OK. Like always.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

"Putting cases on all y'all!"

[–] Intergalactic@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Will election deniers be charged with the necessary crimes this time around?

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 2 points 8 hours ago

I sure hope so. After all of this, if they are still sticking to crimes, and treason, they deserve a nice 'shady vacation'.

[–] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, Kamala runs the senate. They really don't have any option to try the same scheme again. I do worry though, what new tricks they might try.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 2 points 6 hours ago

They'll call for her to recuse herself or whatever, and Democrats have a history of caving to ridiculous demands of Republicans like that.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 9 hours ago

Talking Points Memo - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Talking Points Memo:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America


Wikipedia search about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/some-trump-electors-in-swing-states-are-primed-to-stop-the-steal-again-in-2024
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support