United States | News & Politics

1944 readers

777 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

simsymbiote@midwest.social

Type1@midwest.social

-20

We should condemn Trump voters for supporting Trump's genocide, condemn Harris voters for supporting Harris' genocide, and condemn non-voters for supporting whoever won's genocide (self.usa)

submitted 3 weeks ago by dragonfucker to c/usa@midwest.social

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Okay so the title of this post is a joke. But drag means it with a modicum of seriousness.

You see, the argument against this title is "We can't just blame everyone! If we did that, we'd be leaving people zero good options. We have to choose the least bad decision the voters could have made, and support that one."

Drag thinks this is a very sensible argument and agrees with it. We can't just say "screw every option, every action is bad" on principle. That's not productive. We have to choose some least-bad option to support.

Unfortunately, this argument is the same argument in favour of voting for Harris. A lot of people denied this same argument in the previous 6 months. They said no, you can just say "screw every option, every action is bad". They said not to support the least-bad option.

So therefore, drag is quite convinced that these people, for the sake of ideological consistency, ought to be condemning both the Harris voters and the non-voters.

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] borf@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 3 weeks ago

Inb4 dragonfucker starts shit and gets banned from another community

[–] AresUII@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

We can talk about this in the future if we have an actual voting system