185
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] ptz@dubvee.org 150 points 2 years ago

Good job everyone who sat out or voted 3rd party this election. You saved Palestine!

[-] simplymath@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago
[-] ptz@dubvee.org 32 points 2 years ago

Do you really think he changed his stance since then?

He's also the new US ambassador to Israel. That's from 2 hours ago.

load more comments (46 replies)
[-] krelvar@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I'm sure he's a kinder, gentler Huckabee nowadays.

[-] BMTea@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Joe Biden is still president and over 200 children were slaughtered since the election. Tomorrow is the deadline he gave Israel for letting aid into the north of Gaza, but he will not enforce it because he also believes that there are no such thing as Palestinians and that they should die, leave or live as subjects to Jews so that Israel can annex all territory the Bible grants it.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 62 points 2 years ago

Your new Ambassador to Isreal.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 46 points 2 years ago

Middle to Low Income Americans: fucked

Palestinians: eradicated

Separation of Church and State: homogenized

1%ers: completely torqued

The NWO is here, the Rubes just forgot to mention it was them and the capitalists enacting it not the illuminati

[-] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 26 points 2 years ago

All the ghouls crawling back out from under rocks

[-] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

They weren't hiding, they just stopped screaming long enough to get a good breath of air for the next scream.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 4 points 2 years ago

Crawling back out from the February 24, 2015 rock.

[-] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 21 points 2 years ago

Based on the need for ancient history to claim a people, there's no Americans either. Does that mean we give everything back to the indigenous people? I hope so. Also even if they're Arabs as you say, that doesn't mean you can just murder them indiscriminately like this.

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, an American politician should be wary of making the argument that non-ancient roots in an area make their claim on their land default.

Honestly, I have trouble dealing with the irony that American politicians are pro-zionism becuase Jews used to hold the land a long time ago until they were outcast from their homelands aand forced to move far away, displacing Palestinian people that live tthere now in the process.... and then think that Native American sovereignty (let alone their claim to their historical lands that were stolen from them) are ridiculous and unfair to contemporary US citizens that live here now.

[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No it's okay we have nukes.

I'm trying to be satirical but I can't really think of another argument

[-] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago

Yes, because Israel definitely doesn't have nukes. That would be in violation of international non-proliferation agreements, and they have the utmost respect for international law.

[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

No one respects international law like Uncle Sam and his buddies!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

This guy is about to become Ambassador to Israel btw

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 years ago
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

This is from 2015, just, y'know.

[-] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 2 years ago

I'm sure he's changed his mind on the subject since then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Oh.

Got any updates from Mike Huckabee for us that show a change in stance?

[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Article from 2015

Not that his opinions have likely changed, but please tell people if you're sharing older news articles.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Not that his opinions have likely changed

Exactly

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

No such thing as a Huckabee either.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Oh shit, that’s the first person I ever voted against! As a 17 year old I registered as a republican specifically because I hated him.

[-] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

"And to the left, we have the consequences of our actions."

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
185 points (95.1% liked)

politics

31086 readers
2202 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS