this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
729 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2082 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 138 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Kamala raised over $1 billion dollars for her campaign, most of which was from small donors.

If that doesn't tell the Dems they don't need oligarch money, nothing will.

[–] Ismay@programming.dev 75 points 1 week ago

They know that. Problem is the WANT billionaires money too ^^

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Then they spent it on high per hour political consultants who paid Beyonce to perform

Except Beyonce literally didn't perform for Harris?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a mere pittance compared to what the wealthy actually spend on conservatives and messaging. That's 1 billion dollars every 4 years. Fox news, daily wire, OANN, and all the myriad of other propaganda outlets churn through more than that a year.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes, but we're not talking about conservatives.

The Democratic party has a problem, and that problem is what Democratic voters want doesn't align with what Democratic donors want. The voters want progressive policies passed, while the donors want the same neoliberalism that keeps them rich. And trying to appease one of those groups obviously alienates the other.

If any Democratic politician truly wants to help the American population, the fact that Kamala raised so much money in such a short amount of time, and the fact that many states passed progressive policies even though they voted for Trump, should tell them that they don't need to kowtow to the wealthy because the voters will support them. Unfortunately, I don't think they're going to learn that lesson.

Republicans, of course, don't have this problem because their voters and their donors all want the same thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 78 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Going further right didn't help, now we need to go as left as possible

Radical ideas like Universal healthcare, paid maternity leave, free child care, taxing the rich.

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 60 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Radical ideas the rest of the 1st world had had for 50 years and successfully implemented.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 67 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Like that'll ever happen.

The party is held by a group of political elites who are all about the establishment and power.

There needs to be a new party, a labor party, to represent the working class Americans.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 23 points 1 week ago

I agree.
I voted for Harris because Dems are supposed to be the establishment. Supposed to be a return normal boring politics.

That's obviously not going to work. Now we need an actual working class, under a few million dollar a year takehome party.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 61 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Correct, Biden just cozying up to Trump when he should be using emergency powers to arrest this madman who under the 14th Amendment isn't even eligible to be President was absolutely sickening to me.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Right so... "let's do the thing the fascist threatens to do because we're right and it's justified" is not the same thing as the fascist saying "we'll do it because we're right and it's justified".

Easy to justify the means when you believe in the ends... but of course every one thinks they are right and that everyone else will come to believe they are right, thusly conveniently avoiding any bad consequences.

Do you have any idea what would have happened if Biden just arrested Trump?

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (31 children)

Breaking the rules isn't fascism though. Fascism is fascism.

What do you think is a more ethical choice:

a) uphold the law, knowing it will let fascist come to power and kill thousands

a) break the law and stop him

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Do you have any idea what would have happened if Biden just arrested Trump?

If he would've done it early in his term, I suspect Trump would not have been elected president again. But instead he pushed the idea through some absurdly bureaucratic system that allowed Trump to run the clock out on everything.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Biden doesn't even know wtf is going on. If he does, the last thing he's doing is trying to salvage his legacy. He's got no fight in him.

He truly fucked us. Not saying Harris would've won necessarily, but having only 3 months to run a campaign against someone who's been running for 8 years is tricky. You can see why given the number of people googling if Biden dropped out...

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A legacy of "Used powers given to him by the Supreme Court to stop Hitler 2.0" would be better than "Sucked Trump's dicker harder than Elon did."

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gork@lemm.ee 55 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I instead see them not learning a damn thing and putting up Nancy Pelosi as the Presidential candidate for 2028.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Will she achieve lichdom in time?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

"The establishment party must become an anti-establishment party"

Have you all learned nothing from 2016? Democrats will rather let Trump win that let this happen.

The slide to the right is no accident nor is it ignorance. Fool me once...

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've said this before, but I think it needs to be repeated:

The populist, anti-elitist lane on the left is wide open. I don't know that a mainstream "Democratic" party can take that lane, and I don't know if we should bother trying to drag them there. However, what I can say is that there is going to be some significant hay to make in that field.

I think Pramila Jayapal, Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, Delia Ramirez, Jamaal Bowman, Summer Lee, Cori Bush, Katie Porter, anyone who has been rat-fucked by Democrats should all abandon their identification with the Democratic party and become independents. And in the time that he has left, at their lead, should be Bernie Sanders, who never needed to be told about the consequences of running with milquetoast policies.

Even if they caucus with Democrats, true progressives need to show them that their votes aren't a given, and if they want them, they need to take a step towards their legislative priorities. Giving up our votes without leverage, giving in to the Washington groupthink: THIS LOSES ELECTIONS!

We shouldn't focus on redeeming the Democratic party. Let them sink. Focus on getting good quality, reliable progressive populists elected. The Democratic party is a fucking anchor and we're better off without it. Let those unwilling to let go of that Washington groupthink sink with it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 week ago (7 children)

They cannot and they will not. Please do not fall for them yanking the football away from you again. AOC and Bernie exist to give you hope and thereby capture your vote for a party that has no intention of ever fighting for the working class in a meaningful way. We need a real alternative but we've given away so much of our collective power (unions) that it's hard to see a hopeful path forward. Organize with your neighbors and start building trusted communities that will fight together when needed.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or maybe they should just leave the Democratic party and start a new progressive party? We have less than 4 years, but that's also the most time we'll ever have.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 week ago (40 children)

The problem with that strategy is that our democracy uses a first-past-the-post voting system which trends towards a two-party system.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo&t=31s

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago (51 children)

Then become one of the two parties.

load more comments (51 replies)
load more comments (39 replies)
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Just like GOP refugees created the Tea Party, we need to rally around the greatest symbol of the French Revolution, and build a Guillotine Party.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 31 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Or there needs to be an anti-establishment party, since the Democrats can never be one.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I fear it's too late. Unless the party can be taken by force it won't be enough and we only have 4 years. If dems didn't snub Bernie this all probably wouldn't have happened. Our choices used to be two flavors of corporate fascism, now it's far right vs corporate. Dems are better on social issues, but it's not enough.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Dems are clearly better on economic issues as well. Not nearly good enough, but better. The problem is that they will only go so far, and they won't talk about it, out of fear of angering their wealthy patrons.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

well just in time for the supreme-court-approved executions of the anti-establishment politicians. imagine not getting this after Bernie had massive support despite all the efforts of the Democratic party, and after the orange cunt winning just by paying lip service to being anti-establishment...

seriously, that's all you needed to do. not actually do anything, not help anybody. just fucking lie and pretend you give a shit about people grievances about being crushed by the system.

you couldn't even clear that bar on the fucking ground, and lost to a cunt who's known for firing people, not paying for anything, and shitting on a gold toilet. because you're physically incapable of criticizing systemic oppression.

[–] BMTea@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (27 children)

So long as the Democratic Party leadership are reliant on corporate funding, obsessed with American power projection, smitten with Israel, pensive about worker rights and in lock-step with security and intelligence establishment, there is no hope. You will have on one hand a conservative party that shows antipathy and disdain for real liberal norms (Democratic establishment) and a rabid, evil party intent on reshaping America and the world to reflect white Christian nationalist fanaticism (Republicans.)

10 years ago I would have told you that the Dems are playing a dangerous game with their interventionism. Today they consigned 1 million children to starve, be blown to smithereens and die in order to enable the revenge of a leader who is as corrupt as Trump and far more bloodthirsty. Kamala calls Trump a "fascist" and gives Netanyahu a UN veto and 2000lb bounds to drop near hospitals. This is indiciative of a party that is morally rotten and cannot be relied upon to safeguard anyone's rights.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What?

They are the establishment.

[–] oyo@lemm.ee 40 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Thus the call to become something else; become being the operative word, meaning to change from what they currently are.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ok, and white must become black.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Hear fucking hear.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago

Democrats are the establishment that needs to be laid out to pasture and replaced

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

LA told me

"You'll be a pop star

All you have to change

Is everything you are."

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Democrats don't learn lessons.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago (6 children)

They are the establishment. Why would they ever change? They would rather Trump win, than their easy paychecks be disrupted. You are never going to get a democrat to care about people.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Brodysseus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They have 4 years to tighten up. I'm not optimistic. The only victory they have had since Obama was a fear victory.. nobody wanted Biden they were scared of trump. That is played out.

The right did a good job of parading him around as an anti-establishment, for the common people candidate. I don't think that's true, but a lot of people do.

I hope the D party reorganizes as a populist anti-establishment party and holds a ranked choice primary with some young actually left leaning candidates who can't be bought.

To be honest, if the D party don't reform and earn my vote, I'm not giving it to them out of fear anymore. Before trump I had a "no lesser of two evils" policy for voting. And I'm going back to it. They had 4 years to plan, hold a primary, do some prosecuting of rich criminals, understand why Trump's popular and strategize to beat it, literally fucking anything. Did they?

I'm over it, they can run a fair primary with some progressive candidates and let the people decide, and then I'll vote. Tired of whatever they're doing and it looks like a lot of others are as well. Hope they figure out the obvious issue they have and fix it. Since its a two party system they're hogging the only route that the left has to success and fucking it up remarkably bad. Like I could do a better job and I'm an idiot.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The Democrats need to drop out and let an actually serious party take over

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›