this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
188 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19118 readers
2504 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 150 points 1 day ago (3 children)

he deserves the team around him that he wants. It’s not up to us to determine that.

It absolutely is up to the senate to determine that. The constitution says so.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was about to say, didn't we write in a confirmation vote by the Senate as, effectively, a sanity check? To prevent the President from stuffing his Cabinet with toadies and yes-men?

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It's okay when he's the toadie yes-man

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

The constitution says so.

They have never really cared about the Constitution any more than they have about this country.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But kings don't need constitutions...

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Especially the Burger King.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump is not a King. Perhaps a Barron of sorts.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Good one, well done

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

They need guillotines. Used on them.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 66 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is the same dipshit that blocked hundreds of military promotions because he didn't like the Pentagon's pro-access abortion policy. Even Mitch McConnell pushed back on him then.

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tommy Tuberville is slept on as a candite for the "Most harmful senator" award. He's such a bold-faced boot licker and hasn't done a single thing to uphold his oath of office

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

I would say that's almost every politician out there

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

He is another Russian asset. If the CIA could do their fucking jobs I'd be very greatful.

[–] cfi@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The CIA topples governments. They don't need to do anything but sit back and watch ours topple itself

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago

Wow you're so edgy.

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago

I hope he blocks gaetz then

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Potatotown protecting child rapists again. It's the only thing he's good at.

Edit: I was getting him mixed up with Jim Jordan. I guess the GOP in general just enjoys protecting pedos.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

The party of morality line has always been a front for protecting pedophiles. This dates back prior to Trump with church abuse scandals. But has grown more blatant since 2016, when they put a sexual predator in the White House .

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

Pretty good chance he's done it too

[–] FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago
[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 18 points 1 day ago
[–] drdiddlybadger@pawb.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Does this asshole not realize that others could just as easily tank his career?

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You could never tank a guy named Tommy Tatotown!

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

Tommy Spudcity?

Dude, you were the coach at Auburn. No one is scared of your threats.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He might not be able to deliver on that threat. And once it fails once, it loses it's power and it will never work again.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right. That logic totally explains his second term.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

No, I mean there will definitely be GOP Senators who vote against Trump's picks, if for no other reason that they have 3 votes to spare, and some will get Hall Passes. Thats how the Senate works. Their careers will not be ruined, by Tuberville or anyone else.

[–] whithom@discuss.online 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Haven't you figured this out yet? No one gives a fuck if it's legal or not. We living in the clown world now baby.

[–] whithom@discuss.online 4 points 1 day ago
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Threatening political retribution against senators for voting against their party is generally not illegal in the USA.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

Tumorville needs to have his face rearranged

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Why so defensive?