this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
142 points (96.1% liked)

Videos

14337 readers
550 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 22 points 8 hours ago

This has been coming since they announced Manifest v3. Anyone paying any attention at all knew this was going to happen.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Imagine using you power to "vote for "/support/give power to a company who says it's gonna kill all ad-blockers to monopolise the ad market even further ... and then complain about the exact thing happening.

Using Chrome (or other Google products) is just supporting and enabling that.
If people didn't use it, none if it would have happened.

[–] Custoslibera@lemmy.world 42 points 11 hours ago

Use Firefox.

This is the easiest problem to solve.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 31 points 12 hours ago

Switch to Firefox, be happy.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 38 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Who gives a fuck? Just stop using chrome

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 17 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

There was a time not too long ago where I would have just assumed a move this clearly douchey and against your customers' desires would lead to nothing but a complete evacuation of those customers, but I've seen this movie play out enough times to know that somehow, someway, this will work out just fine for them. People will complain, swallow it whole, keep on using it, and finally just forget about it.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

this stumps me, when an alternatice can be installed in 2 seconds like every other app

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 77 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

New? This is years in the working.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 40 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Literally told people to expect this if they keep using chrome and now they are in disbelief, more so when I send them the screen cap of me telling them to expect it.

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 21 points 13 hours ago

But why would an ad company want to block ad blockers? That makes no sense...

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl -1 points 14 hours ago
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 32 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 9 points 13 hours ago

LibreWolf

Mullvad

Two current best forks of FF for a discerning customer.

Add uBlock to hurt ad tech

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 22 points 15 hours ago
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

How is uBO Lite different from regular uBO?

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

No permissions, unable to do some advanced blocking stuff, unable to pull an updated list of ad urls (which means you have to update the extension to get updated ad lists), and so on

[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Despite all the drawbacks, so far I don't notice a difference.

[–] zoostation@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

The change hasn't even officially happened yet. Over time, following the changes, ad tech will get restructured to take advantage of the new limitations so ads can't be blocked. Nothing will change overnight.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

(which means you have to update the extension to get updated ad lists)

Extensions get updated automatically, though, right?

yes, but ublock gets its blocklists from an external address, which cannot be done with manifest v3. and updating the extension is something that can take weeks until approved, while google could just outmaneuver ublock.

[–] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

That's why I don't use chrome.

[–] coffee_tacos@mander.xyz 22 points 16 hours ago
[–] 0laura@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 15 hours ago
[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

The amount of disconnect with reality in the comments on this is / will continue to be hilarious

[–] nicomachus@programming.dev 4 points 12 hours ago

Chrome is shit. Never liked it and only use it at work.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 4 points 14 hours ago
[–] Mim@lemmy.zip 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That alone would be why it's good if they had to sell it.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 0 points 12 hours ago

The only issue with forcing them to sell it is Mozilla will lose most of its income stream. Hopfully selling it causes much branching making it harder to target firefox in making websites uncompatable.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 hours ago