this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
504 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

59731 readers
3343 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bblkargonaut@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

I haven't found an article yet that can actually articulate the problem with 23 and me right now, and actually did research into it or even read the terms and service. The problem with 23 and me is that they are not maximizing the share holder value of the data they are sitting on. The CEO wants to keep the company in line with the principals they were founded on which is to protect the privacy and data of their customers, while using opt in studies to build data sets that can be studied or sold.

Investors want to enshittify the company, and have been organizing a campaign against to company to try to drive it into liquidation to buy the data, even though the company is profitable. I wouldn't be surprised is they are funding these weekly omfg 23 and me bad articles.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I'm honestly not interested in 23andMe so I never bothered to fact-check so take this with a massive grain of salt but I did watch Linus (from TechTips, not Linux) rant about the privacy problems it has. I don't trust him about these things but I've also watched him rant in favor of letting the ~~spyware~~ consumer features of Windows stay on because they're so great and it's not that big of a deal, so 23andMe has to be doing something very, very wrong.

[–] Grunt4019@lemm.ee 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

On this topic, I did ancestrydna long before I got concerned with my data and privacy. I have since deleted my data and had them destroy my physical sample as well (which took them a long time). But I wonder if the damage is done and even though they say they deleted and destroyed the sample how can I know for sure? Etc

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know James Smith, from Phoenix, Arizona. Social security number 523-098-1322. Is your data safe?

Imagine how you'd freak out if I, by change, got it right.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

What the hell?! You got mine right!

Not really, but it would have been cool. Also, socials are 9 digits in the US.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.world 50 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I am a technology journalist – I like to think I am thoughtful about what data I share with corporations.

My brother in Christ, if you are a tech journalist then you, out of all people, should know not to give ANY data to corporations. That is a massive fuckup regarding your job.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Recreational DNA testing eventually led to discovering that I had never before met my biological father. Mom got it wrong. I met him and his family this summer finally. I am slightly irritated that my last name (and my child’s) is now kind of meaningless, and it’s too much of a hassle to change it.

[–] ouch@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Paternity testing should be done for every child. The child and father should have the same certainty that mothers have.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Completely agree.

I mean there so many videos like this https://youtube.com/shorts/FgzbCJYCBr8 that dude is devastated. Or this 'classic' https://youtube.com/shorts/qj0zsL68Ka8 or this or guy https://youtube.com/shorts/j3PWef89kPw

I could keep going, it's not that hard videos like that's and I wish it was.

Just for a pallet cleanser, look how happy this do is to find out that he is the father. https://youtube.com/shorts/PfRR5iKE70Q

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Even with my experience as a presumed father, and as a falsely-surnamed child, I disagree.

[–] ouch@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It's okay to disagree. But many who would line to know can object only when it's already too late.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The only thing I can imagine working is for a birth certificate when listing father, would have a selection of “presumed” or “verified”, where verified would have a doctor sign off. It should be optional. But it would be nice if a paternity test was presented as an option automatically, without needing suspicion or accusation.

[–] ouch@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That default to suspicion/accusation is why fathers don't have real rights in this matter.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

As it only requires saliva, any father can test their child’s DNA. Babies drool a lot. It may cost a few hundred dollars to do so. I suppose that makes it even less trusting to do it in secret than just having it as standard medical procedure.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Took me too long to realise that article is actually serious. I'd have sworn white people with huge ethnics fetish would show up as "Austrian painter" on their test, but I guess British works. Oh well 🇺🇸

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh, don't worry. If you hadn't given it to them, one or ten of your fucking rellies did anyway and had no clue of the implications either.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I want to upvote this, but ... Why did you have to shorten "relatives"?

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago
[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

I love how they just smash "-ies" onto any word. I started using "sunnies" for sunglasses after hanging out with a few aussies.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (20 children)

I refuse to do it because I'm a twin. We both agree that it's shitty if one of us does it because then the other is forced into it basically, being identical.

Also our dad was a piece of cheating shit so we don't ever want to know about that possibility.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I had in some ways the opposite 23&Me experience and goals. My parents told me growing up that I had some small native ancestry. This is actually a common myth many Americans have either been told or somehow deluded themselves into believing.

So I did the DNA testing (which I now regret from all the obvious enshittification and privacy reasons) to prove that my ancestry was boring and predictable. Which it was, no indigenous ancestry, just the expected European countries that my great grandparents came from.

They also do a lot of nice health screening things and I think that's probably the much more valuable aspect of it. It really is very American that people are so much more concerned with what DNA says about one's race or ethnicity than about their health and wellbeing.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago

Per their terms and conditions

The Services are not intended to tell you anything about your current state of health, or to be used to make medical decisions, including whether or not you should take a medication, how much of a medication you should take, or determine any treatment.

https://www.23andme.com/legal/terms-of-service/

It also seems to be a data harvesting machine that probably has ties to Google

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/23andme-is-terrifying-but-not-for-the-reasons-the-fda-thinks/

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 19 points 20 hours ago

I'm worried about insurance companies getting it and changing rates/services based on my DNA.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 179 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (61 children)

Americans seem get really weird with the whole ancestry thing. There appears to be a desire to look into your family history and find something "exotic", which basically seems to mean non-English - I imagine because that's perceived as the 'default' ancestry, so-to-speak.

Honestly, who the fuck cares? What difference does it make? Nationalities aren't Skyrim races. You don't get special abilities. It makes no difference whether your ancestors were British/Irish/Spanish/French/whatever.

E: This is obviously not intended as a hateful statement, people. You have to understand that the rest of the world doesn't care about this, so we're confused when we look to the US and see them take it so seriously. We're especially puzzled when Americans say "I'm Irish" because their great great great uncle bought a pint of Guiness in the 1870s. It's an alien concept to the rest of the planet.

[–] ToucheGoodSir@lemy.lol 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I've seen a couple studies that concluded blonde white people were more resistant to frost bite. People with darker skin are probably gonna do better the closer to the equator you are sun burn and skin cancer wise. Asian people have the eyes that look more closed by default as it helps in environments that are more humid. All of those seem like super powers to me o.o tho yeah I don't think you need to know your specific genetic makeup for any of that.

[–] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

Nationalities aren't Skyrim races. You don't get special abilities.

"It wasn't until I learned that I was 90% British that it all made sense... my inhuman ability to queue for hours, my fastidiousness surrounding permits, and hatred for the French... I knew I was special, but I never imagined how special."

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

While true, a lot of older people in the UK get really, really racist when it comes to their bloodline. Some people view themselves as more British than others because of their lineage towards the Saxons, as opposed to people that have been here for 100+ years that may have originated from elsewhere. Many don't consider anyone to be British if they emigrated from somewhere like Jamaica, India, or Ireland because, in their view, only the pure Anglo Saxons are the original Brits, even if 5-6 generations of their family grew up here, embedded themselves into society

I do agree that Americans are really weird when it comes to their ancestry, especially considering they come from a country that is very anti-immigration. IMO if you want to claim that you are 50% British or whatever, you shouldn't be blocking British people from moving to your country (and vice versa).

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You speak for yourself. As an Englishman I get 5% water resistance and +2 charisma when dealing with non-Europeans.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

You lose that buff two weeks after acclimitizing to another country, and the perceived extra charisma is actually people nervously smiling around you to mask their limited english (half the language is just obscure idioms)

[–] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Europeans: haha you guys have no history!

Also Europeans: haha you're curious where your family emigrated from! Losers!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Earflap@reddthat.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The rest of the world has no ability to understand, because they've been in the same place for 700 generations.

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 2 points 11 hours ago

The fuck are you talking about?

load more comments (55 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I still find it funny people think these tests mean anything. "you have these 7/9 genes in common with Jasper Brittania and are therefore 77% british"

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

Stories tend to disappear with the passing away of living memory. These tests are a hope to revive a story of where we came from. It doesn't, obviously, but I can't blame people for want.

load more comments
view more: next ›