207

Elon Musk spent over a quarter of a billion dollars to help Donald Trump win November's presidential election, according to new filings, underscoring the influence one of the world's wealthiest people had on this year's White House race.

The billionaire owner of electric car maker Tesla and SpaceX gave $259 million to groups supporting Trump's 2024 campaign, according to new Federal Election Commission filings released late on Thursday.

The huge donations made Musk one of the biggest underwriters of a presidential campaign in U.S. history, helping him to become a powerful political ally of Trump and someone who now plays a key role in shaping the incoming Republican administration's policy agenda.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] intresteph@discuss.online 41 points 2 years ago

Elon is a CEO… just saying.

[-] normalexit@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I really hope he doesn't threaten to gut people's retirement funds and gets shot for it. That would be terrible.

[-] intresteph@discuss.online 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Oh I know, getting shiot would just be totally ^not^ necessary.

[-] normalexit@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

(I curse a lot so "shot" got autocorrected to shit. Then I tried to fix it on my mobile. I got there eventually!)

[-] intresteph@discuss.online 5 points 2 years ago

Oh I thought you were being sneaky ;)

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago

Yes, he spent the equivalent of ~$105 if you make $100,000/year. If you make $100,000, spending $100 to buy the government? You'd be dumb not to.

[-] DrDeadCrash@programming.dev 25 points 2 years ago

Which is why billionaires shouldn't be a thing.

[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Id argue the bigger issue is that money has the ability to influence politics at all. We need to remove it completely.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 9 points 2 years ago

And it's a fraction of what his corporations received from the federal government in various grants, contracts and subsidies. I'm sure he'll earn all of that back when his government efficiency office privatises everything to companies he runs.

[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

which is .074% of his net worth. Bought himself a good 4+ year return.

250000000/337300000000*100

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Musk is worth about $234bn, so it's closer to 0.001% of his net worth

[-] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Elon Musk could lose, spend, and / or give away 99% of his net worth and still be a multi-billionaire.

[-] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And now he's in charge of directing government funds to his companies (for "efficiency").

Swamp drained!!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Pretty much pocket change for him. We allowed people to get so wealthy that they can buy their way into power wherever and whenever they want and they are reaping the benefits writ large.

[-] towerful@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago

And apparently made $100bn. So, that's a decent ROI!
https://lemmy.world/post/22871743

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

More importantantly he bought Twitter.

[-] Zier@fedia.io 6 points 2 years ago

So can we find the people he paid to vote for fat donnie?

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago

Lovely how so many lefties bought Tesla's, which means that indirectly they funded Trump's election

Lovely how any of that shitbis legal

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

I'm not clicking that. What's the story? He did the thing he said he was doing?

this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
207 points (98.6% liked)

News

39536 readers
1434 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS