NixOS. If you played around with Arch you'll be fine. My only gripe (although it's kind of important) is NVIDIA doesn't work. Call me lazy but I haven't felt like switching to an other distro, plus I'm not much of a hardcore gamer.
Operating Systems
All things operating system related, from Windows to Mac to Linux distros and the more obscure.
Subcommunity of Technology.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
Ok, since I created this thread I think reflashed the same thumb drive with four or five distros already.
Without actually installing anything.
This is going to have me obsessing for a bit.. :)
Im really surprised that I don't see zorin os on these types of threads. Its main stick is to be chock full of out of the box software especially around windows compatibility. wine and play on linux are ready right away and I can run most windows programs right after install.
I have my gaming computer hooked to my TV and running Chimera OS. Makes it easy to use with just a controller.
Win11 is worse than a phone vis a vis spying. Finally made a switch. could not install popOS, so ended up with mint.
Arch Linux at the moment, though I distro hop quite a bit!
When it comes to gaming, I can't really say I've found a distro that "felt" better for gaming, and I've been on a fair amount of them - Fedora (and Nobara), Arch, NixOS, Endeavour, pop!_OS - I haven't noticed a difference. I didn't measure benchmarks because at the end of the day its about what I can perceive, not what I can read from a spreadsheet.
Realistically I think the only difference I ever noticed was with pop there's a Nvidia ISO that has the drivers already included in the live environment, so I get to skip a step post-install.
I find myself just using Flatpaks for gaming stuff (Steam, Bottles, Heroic, etc) these days since I know that I can take those on just about any distro. I've heard that there is some FPS loss from running games through Flatpak, but again I haven't done any benchmarks so I can't confirm nor deny this.
I'm on Slackware - it's a bit of a pain because Steam is 32 bit so you have to install the compat libs.
Slackware! How's that these days?
It's exactly the way it was, but with higher version numbers for all the software!
Which is how I like it if I'm going to be honest. All the other distros are too clever. They overwrite your config files or put them in dumb places. With Slackware, I know where everything is and it just works.
The binary package manager is simple but effective, even if it doesn't have dependency management. That can be a bit of a pain, but it's a small one.
The latest release is brilliant.
For me Fedora is my go-to, but I'm looking at moving to Nobara
How come? Isn't Nobara just Fedora but a bit easier to get going? Or have I missed their point?
Figured since you already have a running Fedora installation you ought to have what you need already set up?