this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
773 points (99.2% liked)

Games

32910 readers
1533 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

I am so confused by all this. It makes me feel old.

Funko is essentialy just plastic, shitty Beanie Babies, right? They do nothing original, from what I can tell.

[–] homesnatch@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago (18 children)

Some people are looking past the partner or putting "partner" in quotes.

Funko doesn't handle these takedown requests, they hired BrandShield for this. BrandShield definitely went overboard and their reputation is at risk.

I've shopped around for brand protection in the past when scammers registered a domain name with my company's name in it, and used it to do fake job offers. We got the domain suspended by contacting the registrar, but we didn't know about it until it was reported to us.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 8 points 1 week ago

The factory didn’t beat up the strikers. The Pinkertons did it. Don’t hate the factory owner who hired them to beat up the striking workers.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

They were hired specifically to go overboard and risk reputation. To shield brand from reputational damage of scorching internet. It's even in their name.

Tsar is good, blame the boyars.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

No, Funko's reputation is at risk, as it should be.

Other companies should look at the situation and cease using BrandShield, but from a consumer standpoint, the blame falls squarely on Funko.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] oVerde@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] Agent_Karyo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Come on, man.

I support reigning in corrupt oligarchs (full asset seizure, 20 years mandatory community service as a live-in junior janitor in a hospice care facility) as much as the next person, but this is stupid.

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago

Uh no, this was annoying but none of the companies involved deny care for sick people which increases their chance to die.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MissingInteger@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

community notes is the best thing post-musk twitter ever did and i hope the idea spreads to other platforms

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

It's a matter of time before he sacks it. Kinda surprised he hasn't already.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What's to say that this wasn't just a combination of stupid actions?

Someone makes a report with the wrong category. Someone takes a way over-the-top action in response to the report.

There are a lot of idiots with a lot of power who do things without thinking them through.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›