I might be content, but definitely not original, more like a repost at maybe 30% the original pixelation with half a dozen watermarks from various sites with bad crops.

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago

I too have terminally online syndrome and read “contěnt” as “cǒntent”

[–] Idea@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No, but I am continent. So I have that going for me...

[–] xuxxun@beehaw.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

Which one? Australia?

[–] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago

I think I classify as content. The noun, not the adjective.
One can co sume me in about one sitting. Not many fans, my story probably won't ramp up

[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

No, but I continue in spite

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago

No but I'm powerless to improve my life so it doesn't really matter

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Hell yeah UNIX surrealism

[–] Louisoix@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not sure if I'm that bad at reading sarcasm, or are people in the comments for real. It's also early in the morning, so I might have completely missed the point of the post, or just stupid.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

That word has been ruined.

For example, younger people these days constantly talk about “content” because that’s what they hear from the influencers and streamers and whatnot they watch religiously.

Ask the kid, Why did you do that? And get back “for the content!” (And nobody is even filming lol)