this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
733 points (91.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27132 readers
3613 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 3 points 58 minutes ago

“ ‘Private property is the smallest unit of warfare’ - The Environmental Rescue Team Handbook”

Annalee Newitz, The Terraformers (2023), chapter 15

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 19 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Had to put on pants to go outside due to artificially created laws.

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

I dunno I kind of hate sitting where someone else's sweaty ass has sat on first. I'll let this one slide.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 42 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I don't care if you hate him; he's right on this. this entire thing is bullshit.

[–] ViolentPacifist@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 26 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

A lot of people think he's become a bit of a wanker on social media and IRL. Some of his tweets are cringe and makes him doing like he's lightyears up his own ass.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 1 points 1 hour ago

Sometimes I think he forgets he's there to be the science guy and makes it about himself a lot, but when he gets on a science rant that's when hea good, just going on about his love of science and why it's cool as fuck.

Getting James Cameron to fix the stars in the Titanic remake boosted his ego a little bit, but I get that, I'd be a bit ego filled if I was able to make James Cameron change something in his film.

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I was one of them until I realized that in grand scheme of things, he is net positive. So I don’t care if he is cringe, I learn quite a bit from him and I wish more influential people were smart like him.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Fair enough. Maybe I just miss Carl too much

[–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

That's always understandable. I think the bigger picture here is that we sometimes forget that they're all humans, not just public figures. They have other thoughts and opinions that aren't curated for the world.

Plus, Sagan's era didn't have Internet. People weren't sharing with the world every single fucking thought that came out of their head. I'm sure we would've heard Sagan say some dumb shit here and there if he had to produce today's world's kind of content.

[–] AmosBurton_ThatGuy@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 hours ago

I don't use twitter (never have tbh) so I've only ever seen screenshots of his more infamous tweets, but I have listened to a LOT of his startalk podcast. Most of the time he's an entertaining person and seems to admit when he doesn't know enough about a given subject (although I've seen a lot of criticism that he does tend to talk about things he doesn't know, it doesn't seem to be that way in the podcast at least)

He can be annoying in some of his podcasts though and you can feel his guests being diplomatic about it while still hearing a bit of annoyance in their voice or next sentence etc. But overall I rather quite like him, despite the Internet's disdain for him.

More people making science popular and easily digestible is always a good thing IMO. But I'm also biased because I've really liked NDT since I was a kid due to seeing him in space documentaries when I was young, and I still love his version of Cosmos.

[–] halowpeano@lemmy.world 30 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I think it actually is interesting if you're going to call out humans as a species of animal!

All across species from unicellular to megafauna, from plants to fungus, you can find mechanisms used to defend an individual's physical territory. Ants and bees from the same species will fight and kill others colony members of they stray into their territory. Bears will fight and kill other bears. Our closest relatives, chimps, will go to war with neighboring chimp bands.

Artificial borders are humans way of saying "this is my territory enter at your own risk". The REALLY interesting thing is that we have established systematic exceptions to the behaviors we see in nature. "Ask us before you come and you can visit and be safe here from those that enforce our territory."

The temporary nature is unique, many social animals will permanently adopt an outsider into their group on occasion, equivalent to immigration, but I'm not aware of any that have pre-agreed temporary violations of group territory.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I guess you can draw that comparison, but then human territories are exponentially bigger than anything an equivalent social animal might claim as "enter at your risk" area. A traveling pack of dogs can just go around another pack's territory. We can't do that, we're boxed in. There's no neutral space left. I guess you could argue there's international waters, but that's practically inaccessible to most people.

[–] UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com 2 points 2 hours ago

okay I don't know how to articulate this properly but i'll try;

fukn get rekt ngt

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 42 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (17 children)

I love all the posts calling him arrogant and elitist for pointing out something, in a critical manner, that by their nature are arrogant and elitist: nation state borders.

Those things that make people who've done nothing feel entitled to more resources than other people by virtue of where their mother was hanging out when she popped them out.

I think dwelling on their artifical, self-serving nature is healthier than taking them seriously in any other sense than the threat of state violence for failing to pretend that they're sacred.

Humanity, not to be confused with your own individual greed or birth lottery results, would be far better off abolishing them. They bring nothing to the table but dehumanization, death, and inequity. Most, even most who consider themselves to be on the privileged side of the imaginary line in the dirt, have far more in common with the people trying to get to the privileged side than the miniscule populations of sociopath humans that use them to secure and metastasize their ego score hoards, the entire point of them.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 18 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

I think about this a few times a year and I become sad each time. We only get this one planet in the whole ass universe. And we can barely see all of it, unless we're lucky and/or rich (at least moreso than most of humankind).

It's profoundly ridiculous.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I was flying to south East Asia, looking at the digital map of the plane. From above, you can kinda see the country lines.

What made me feel that incredible sadness is that within a 1000 mile radius, a child born might live in a world where they struggle with starvation and have worms in their stomach, or wake up each day with anime and toys. Some countries have so much wealth and resources. Where others barely have anything. I think about all of that as I fly to my vacation destination, having been incredibly lucky to have been born in a pretty wealthy country.

One could argue that you can be poor/abused anywhere. But there's a clear difference in quality of life here.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

One could argue that you can be poor/abused anywhere. But there's a clear difference in quality of life here.

Very true. You've captured my exact sentiment here.

And also, the very fact that you can be poor even in rich countries is an even greater failure of the system. Nobody in a "rich" country should be impoverished. There are plenty of resources there to take care of everyone as long as we all work together. But the system rewards only those who work for themselves.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Hell, no one in the world would need to work more than 10hr a week if it was our goal and we just decided to equitably and efficiently share resources.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

That would be pretty sweet if accurate. Just satisfy the bare necessities and be free the rest of the time. Exploring other topics, for fun and benefit.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

If we can supply this many people with the basics necessary for survival and work under our current extractive systems, and these systems concentrate resources in the wealthy few, then we clearly have enough to raise the standard of living worldwide. All the while reducing individual labor requirements,

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 55 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

Wait til you learn that the reason you hate immigrants and immigration is that the wealthy conditioned you to hate them. Notice how capital can cross borders, but people can't? This allows the wealthy to profit off of international arbitrage, while regular citizens can't. A CEO can move a factory to a low cost country to save on labor, but you in a wealthy country can't move there to save on cost of living. And the citizens in a poor country can't move to a wealthy country to earn better wages. The corporations get to take advantage of international arbitrage, but you don't.

[–] sean@lemmy.wtf 26 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Corporations are people except when they're conveniently not!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 25 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Black science man always talks like he's done weed for the first time and is trying to impress his nephew's friends.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] _____@lemm.ee 117 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

NDT the goat of saying rly dumb shit but everyone thinks it's somehow enlightening. he's like Jaden smith but Twitter likes him

[–] fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world 77 points 20 hours ago (9 children)

I mean I agree with him here. It's ridiculous how we are still this tribalistic species while basically everyone would be better off when we would work together (e.g. climate change would be non-existent)

[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago

It is possible to agree with something and still believe it is terribly presented.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›