this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
97 points (88.8% liked)

World News

39346 readers
2812 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

World GDP: $105.4 trillion USD

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 13 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

How effective would it be to sprinkle CEO dust into the sky?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

I'm not saying we should try it and find out, but I've heard worse ideas.

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago

I'm still set on "we're fucked" until I see some more hopeful news.

When we are fucked and who is first fucked, and making sure I'm not that guy is what I'm trying to determine.

[–] rusticus@lemm.ee 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Can we use zirconium for $1 trillion?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

How much if we use rhinestones?

[–] febra@lemmy.world 26 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Amazing. Instead of just.. fighting climate change by not polluting the planet let's just fill our entire atmosphere with diamond dust, because that's the logical decision of course.

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It's not really any different than usual dust, other than it is even more likely to scratch your phone (oh no!). The surprising thing is the bullshit price number, I'm sure it's some brain-dead economist looking at the point-price for diamond and with great effort making a single multiplication.

Edit: The study does note industrial diamond manufacturing, but doesn't go into detail on why it's so expensive for diamond powder, other than saying "it would require much more industrial diamond than is currently produced".... Which is just.... Empty? Considering industry would change to account for such a drastic rise in demand.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't this kind of thing the premise for all those "snowball Earth" sci Fi stories where global cooling went too far

[–] Ydna@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

No don't worry about that!

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago

Break into the diamond company vaults and just take it. Bam, free diamonds.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 11 points 10 hours ago

The silicosis will run rampant

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 25 points 12 hours ago

The artificially-inflated price of the diamonds should be irrelevant in this calculation.

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 18 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Sweet! Four more years of Trump presidency, and Elon Musk can just pay for it out of pocket.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Elon musk's kids should be made an example of when reclamation comes around.

They're being brought up thinking they can live like gods. How unfortunate would it be if they actually had to live like the rest of us...

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 17 points 20 hours ago

Someone heard The Beatles (or maybe Rihanna) for their first time and thought "Diamonds in the sky... Huh... What if...".

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes, let's just have everyone on Earth breathe in diamond dust all day every day. There's no way that could be bad for our health.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 15 hours ago

just wear masks for a few decades, potentially respirators, and probably add whole house air filtration if you want to take it off at night.

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 24 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

There's never been a case of something having different behavior or health effects just because of a tiny chemical difference (trans fat) or size difference (micro plastics), what's the worst that could happen?

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 23 points 20 hours ago

There have never been lung issues caused by inhaling very small dust particles, right?

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 79 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Does it have to be diamonds? Could we maybe use the ashes of billionaires instead?

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Isn't diamond manufactured in labs in 15 minutes now? I think the price is assuming natural diamonds value

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Human ashes are mostly carbon, so yes, of course. We'll run out of billionaires pretty quickly, though.

[–] vikingr@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago

Sounds like a win-win tbh

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago

Let's give it a trial run with a few thousand then we can measure the impact and reevaluate.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Of all the aerosols they could think about!

No chance at all of a basically indestructible material not being destructed if absorbed by lungs (or gills) and leading to some disease. You don't need to check. There's no way this could go wrong.

Or, rather... I believe lead is cheaper... Given how much people like to use it, maybe it's a better option.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

Diamond Lung.

Sounds posh.

[–] pedro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

We're carbon based lifeforms and diamonds, yep, made of carbon. What could possibly go wrong!? /s

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I was thinking asbestos...

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, like asbestos... if asbestos bio-accumulated forever.

Instead, the world has a few mechanisms that will make asbestos harmless after a few generations. Not so much for diamonds.

[–] SacralPlexus@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago

Whatever you do, don’t look up silicosis. Not a problem at all. Not relevant.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pageflight@lemmy.world 24 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

So what would it cost to replace all fossil fuel energy with renewable?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You are missing the point, because we need to do that anyway.
The idea is to prevent things from getting worse in the meantime.
Replacing fossil fuels take time no matter how much we invest.

[–] ComicalMayhem@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

ok but you just know corporations are going to use this as an excuse to keep using fossil fuels. like to them this is basically carte blanche to keep the status quo and block green energy from happening even harder. "oh hurdur har har we found a solution to climate change and it's dumping diamonds in the atmosphere, no need to pay for green energy anymore haha" type shit

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

corporations are going to use this as an excuse to keep using fossil fuels.

Corporations follow the law, the only way to solove this is to have the laws required.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Corporations follow the law

Good one

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Oh please, of course they don't always, but the ones that don't are generally forced to by oversight.
Yes I kn ow they generally get off easy, but then oversight is increased and if it continues, the penalties increase, until ultimately it will be forced to shut down if illegal activities continue.
So yes generally cooperations do follow the law.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

That amount sounds like total bullshit. Diamonds can be manufactured and once that is done at scale, it won't be all that expensive. Even at $10000 a ton, five million tonnes would cost just 50 billion.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These are not good ideas. Remember that global warming is just an overarching effect of pollution which we will still have. What diamond dust pollution effects will be, no one knows, but I doubt we want to find out.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

The fossil fuel oligarchy would prefer to give all mammals on Earth emphysema than stop burning fossils, and do it for 10x the price.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 day ago

Nice try, DeBeers.

[–] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago

It's not cost effective to save humanity. Stock prices would crash.

load more comments
view more: next ›