What about twitters project?
Chat
Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
Twitter's project? You mean Jack Dorsey's BlueSky? It doesn't do ActivityPub - it's not part of the fediverse
It is federated, but I forgot it wasn’t activitypub.
It's decentralised and open-source, but not federated, as it works on its own isolated protocol (similar to Matrix)
Matrix is also federated... having your own protocol is not related to the concept of federation, which is simply the property of having the ability to run your own servers and join a network of other servers which share a protocol.
Yes ,and no.
It depends on how you define both terms. If decentralised = federated, matrix is federated. But if federation is defined as a model of social network in which different servers based on different platforms interact through the use of the same protocol(S) (decentralisation + interoperability), being isolated, Matrix doesn't fit the definition.
Because Matrix doesn't accept other platforms to enter its protocol, nor plans on adding it's commonly not considered to be truly federated
Matrix does. There's multiple different projects that implement Matrix's protocols: https://matrix.org/ecosystem/servers/
Those are still Matrix (platform) style servers.
You don't have something like Mastodon vs Pixelfed vs Lemmy in terms of diversity of products.
Those all speak ActivityPub.
But if you want to put some weird UI to say that it's federated (which is not necessary to be a federated service). You have Cerulean : https://matrix.org/blog/2020/12/18/introducing-cerulean/
I know they are ActiVItyPub based. I'm talking about the diversity of platforms, not which protocol they use.
that it’s federated (which is not necessary to be a federated service).
What do you mean by this?
This is great, I don't think federating with Meta will benefit the admins' mission with this instance much at all.
Good shit
Good on them. Always imagine it was Reddit pulling this move.
Hell yea, fuck meta.
I truly do t understand why so many people in the fediverse are so willing to "give meta a chance". Why?! Why would would get closer to the limbs ripping machine just because they painted it a different color?
Every single Zuckerberg social media venture had "raze everyone else to the ground" as a step, but you think this one won't?? This time the leopard won't eat our faces?!
More instances should consider this pact.
The link to the pact nearly blinded me. Animated falling hearts and bright pink background. For a minute there I thought I travelled back in time to the 90's. Also I hasten to add that everyone blocking Meta seems like quite an unfederated thing to do. That said I hate Meta, block 'em.
That combined with the lack of capitalization is off-putting for some reason. It grates on me and I can't put my finger on why.
Refusing to federate with Meta servers is practically a no-brainer anyways.
Nobody really wants brain-dead facebook users on the fediverse anyways.^1^
1 > This, of course, doesn't include anyone owning a facebook account out of necessity who also has the technical knowledge to register and conduct themselves appropriately on the Fediverse in general.
Glad to hear it!
let them create there's and lets see what happens. I do not like meta but i like their open source projects like react and lexical. if they do any unethical stuff we can just not use them.
if they do any unethical stuff we
If? When...
ayyye ty <3