I'm kinda in awe how Elon finds every day new ways to be a utter and complete piece of shit.
this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
350 points (97.3% liked)
Enough Musk Spam
2292 readers
151 users here now
For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.
No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.
Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.
Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.
Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm not, only because I've never once been in awe of any damn thing that piece of shit has ever ~~done~~ stolen credit for, and don't intend to start now.
It's a super power. No ordinary person could do it this much.
No ordinary has enough free time to even attempt it!
load more comments
(1 replies)
Can somebody take aim on his head finally?
Won't somebody rid us of this meddlesome billionaire?
TBH i think we need Mario for this one
load more comments
(1 replies)
Nah, too basic and low-tech. He deserves nothing less than a drone strike
Ya he needs one of those knife missles we usually reserve for “terrorists”
load more comments
(1 replies)
I'd prefer him taken out by his own spawn. FSDing down a cliff.
I'm wishing for a stroke and locked-in syndrome.
Let him experience hell on earth before he dies.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Drone strikes are too covert.
You want death to knock first for a guy like Musk. Make him answer the door.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Gonna need Mario for that
Time to annually donate to wikipedia.
You know, I do usually, but now I'm going to go monthly.
Been monthly for years. I truly believe it is the most important thing humanity has ever built. Nothing has done more to make knowledge accessible.
I donated once this month already but I'll fucking do it again.
Elon takes aim and the media are right there to make his job easier. Thank goodness there's reporting on everything he wants.
Crowdsourced information does put a bit of a damper on the whole “history written by the victors” thing.
Guy who owns biased platform claims other platform that has negative views on him is biased. Someone tell Elon that if he donates enough he can have controlling shares of Wiki. He can't, but he doesn't have to know that.
Fourth most visited site in the world.. he wants to install ads on it and own it.
(and control what it says)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Well, I hate to admit it, but I've never donated to Wikipedia.
But this just made me set up a recurring donation. Streisand effect sorta, I guess.
Fuck Elon Musk.
Ah yes, any platform that may contradict his obvious attempt to dominate America through propaganda must be removed.
This is why billionaires shouldn't exist.
If only someone would make them not exist.
Elon’s a pretty public guy, right?
Mmm,
Mmhmm
Oh
Musk's actions and expressed views have made him a polarizing figure. He has been criticized for making unscientific and misleading statements, including COVID-19 misinformation; affirming antisemitic and transphobic comments, and promoting conspiracy theories. His ownership of Twitter has been controversial because of the layoffs of a large number of employees, an increase in posts containing hate speech, misinformation and disinformation on the website, and changes to website features, including verification.
Ah, that’s probably why. People are allowed to expose him without being censored on wiki.
"Wikipedia is built on the premise that it becomes better when more people of different backgrounds—including political persuasions—source, edit, curate and research content. Our equity goal advances that. The 'Safety & Inclusion' goal (now titled 'Safety & Integrity' in our 2024-2025 plan) is focused on ensuring that people are able to freely access and safely contribute to knowledge on Wikipedia in a changing legal and policy environment globally."
Magoo: RAAAAGGGGEEEEE!!! WHITE CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIANS are the only REAL people!! WE'RE the only people that matter!!
load more comments
(5 replies)
Made a donation just to spite him. Fuck you Elon.
I actually wasn't going to donate to Wikipedia this year because I'm pretty strapped but fuck it. I'm donating more than I did last year I can put more stuff on a credit card this season instead.
Fuck Elon Musk. And fuck anyone who buys his stupid fucking cars.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I donate $20 every year, but I also donate again whenever this goof makes headlines going after Wikipedia. Feels good. Fuck you, cunt.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Donated $50. First time.
Thanks for donating! I give annually too. But we’re going to have to step up our contributions, both financially and in terms of information, if we want to keep Wikipedia a resource for free information and not free propaganda. Megacorps like EM’s and their lobbyists are always fucking up articles, trying to outpace the volunteers who vet the information.
Just look at the Consumer Brands Association or the National Restaurant Association (the lobbying groups who are responsible for suppressing ultra-processed food regulation and fair wage legislation). Among their claims on the Wikipedia pages are that Michelle Obama “asked for their help” for her healthy eating campaign and that they exist to encourage responsible food selection by consumers— referring to sources that are actually about MO issuing a warning to them to improve food labels or else.
Another example is the Scientology page which has been locked due to the relentless efforts of Scientologists constantly trying to edit it with misinformation. Maintaining the integrity of the platform is really a tireless service that volunteers of Wikipedia Foundation provide.
For those who may not be able to donate or want to take additional steps to protect the freedom of shared information, consider contributing to an article you’re passionate about. Platforms like Udemy and Coursera offer free courses on how to research and verify information effectively. While I’ve always been a strong advocate for public libraries, it’s clear that Wikipedia is the essential resource when it comes to current and accessible knowledge.
load more comments
(1 replies)
So I just donated to Wikipedia.
Now they're openly admiting that they're against everything that makes the live better for everyone? Has the brainwashing succeeded?
load more comments
(2 replies)
FYI, Elon, you can't sue for libel/slander if what people are saying is actually true.
You can if you change the definition of libel (or terrorism) to be ‘anything that negatively affects an ultra rich person’. Which is what is happening before our very eyes.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I donated to Wikipedia for the first time because fuck that guy.
Same
Donated as well. Fuck Musk.
~~The reaction to this completely neutral article says it all. Right-wing snowflakes gonna ❄️.~~
Edit: Or not... see @ChairmanMeow's response.
Btw.
In January 2024, David Rozado, an associate professor in computational science at New Zealand's Otago Polytechnic, published a study that found: "Wikipedia was more likely to portray right-leaning figures negatively than their left-leaning counterparts."
The real question is not whether Wikipedia is biased, but whether it's fair. In politics not everybody is equally right. And there are some real shit heads on the right. In other words Elon Musk is not entitled to a positive Wikipedia page.
I think this is just a case of unclear UI. This is the default stance of the meter, before you've entered a vote. After you vote it shows the most common answer underneath the meter.
I voted just now, and the most common vote was "fair/center".
Note how the needle is also off the meter, instead of pointing at one of the segments.
load more comments
(3 replies)
This parasite is doing his best to lead humanity further down the path of annihilation. He needs to go.
If you didn't buy a bunch of hard drives on Black Friday, ya probably should've.
Information is about to get restricted. Authoritarianism is coming down the pipes.
Buckle up, buttercup. Encrypt that shit and hang on.
Just like he's increasing Secular Talk viewership he's also increasing Wikipedia donations.
I hope lots of folks also download copies of Wikipedia, just in case. Elon is a sore loser type with too much money and free time.
i don't get what problem you would have about "bias" over wikipedia if you care about the truth and facts.
just kind of exposes what it's really about for musk.
Oh, that reminds me I have to renew my donation.
view more: next ›