it's to protect themselves from a lawsuit.
these warnings aren't added retroactively to protect customers, they're added proactively to save on court settlements.
this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
70 points (90.7% liked)
memes
10922 readers
3260 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sometimes, but not always.
Correction....
they're added retroactively as a result of the first court case
- all safety rules are written in blood
This doesn't even seem like the most egregious "weird warning".
Thinking you can use a pet urine cleaner for fibres on a shaggy dog isn't madness, it's just "nope, actually a skin irritant".
It can be funny when the legal department's Cover-Your-Ass labelling conflicts with marketing.
Then why make a shampoo for cars and pets?
"My dirty pet was in the car, so..."
They forgot to warn you about not using it as shampoo. They're so getting sued.
Ive heard about the dog owner who washed thier dog, and used the microwave to dry it. Didnt end well.