84
submitted 2 years ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 95 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

An odd way to state that African Americans have disproportionately high amounts of medical debt; if anything, it's an indicator of unequal access to economic opportunities that let people afford expensive medical treatments.

Therefore, rather than shifting the narrative into one of handouts, a better solution would be to make progress on reducing the country's inflated medical costs—the result of capitalism being applied to the inelastic demand for essential medical services.

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sorry I'm a conservative so if it helps black people it's the devils work

I wish I could make the /S bigger here

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago

Before reading the article I'm guessing they are over-represented in a combination of medical debt and lower credit scores.

[-] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 22 points 2 years ago
[-] spacecadet@lemm.ee 21 points 2 years ago

I don’t care who it disproportionately helps, this is a major win for society as a whole. Now do student loans next

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The point is that it addresses a historic inequality. We should care about addressing those

[-] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

While it may, I almost wish they wouldn't say anything about that aspect of it because I'm concerned about if it gets the wrong people's attention they'd try to roll it back. Just want a win that they don't immediately try to undo.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Conservatives don’t need another reason to roll this back besides money

[-] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Precisely why I want their attention somewhere else.

[-] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 years ago

Time to celebrate a first.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago

Conservatives find a way to roll it back, even if it means hurting white people too, in 3...2...1...

[-] irish_link@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Even if I were to take the headline at face value. “The other people get more relief than you do!” Okay, I have had shit tons of medical debt. Times I had to make a payment plan. You telling me there is a group defined by race that have it even worse. Well I am shocked to learn that /s.

This doesn’t wipe the debt so no one is in the clear. It just doesn’t hurt your credit so you can actually still apply for the better place or a new home. Chill the f out you asshats.

[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

On Tuesday, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced a new federal rule aimed at removing medical debt from the credit reports of millions of Americans.

Will be undone by the next administration in just over a week. Not concrete enough.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago

Willing to put money where your mouth is on that timeline?

[-] nawb@lemmings.world 1 points 2 years ago

I think it needs to be really clear that this is not actually removing the debt, as in it would no longer have to be repaid, but rather just taking it off of the credit report. The people with the debt are still required to pay the debt.

Even if one has conservative political viewpoints, I do not think that removing health related information from a credit report should be an issue for anyone. And the debt will still have to be paid off no matter whether it is removed from the report or not, so it is not a government hand out of money.

this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
84 points (84.4% liked)

News

39528 readers
1421 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS