this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
48 points (88.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27480 readers
1851 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Several movie and TV sites have come and go where you can just visit and watch without even creating an account. Quality might not be as good as a paid service and they are no doubt in the grey-to-red zone legally. I don't see the same service for music.

Why do you think is there such a difference in trends?

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 5 points 6 days ago

YouTube with ad blockers took that over.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Pandora? Spotify? There was another one like Pandora I used to use in high school but I can't even remember the name of it now it was so long ago... Before all that we had shoutcasts on Winamp (basically podcasts and streaming radio). Free streaming music is older than free streaming videos, so far as my experience knows.

Not to mention radio. The original over the air "streaming" service.

[–] HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There is!

Ceck out this (android): ViMusic

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm crying (deservedly) in iOS

[–] HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Its just a frontend for YouTube music essentially. Maybe worth taking a look if someone makes something similar now with sideloading being an option

Edit: 2 minutes of googling lead me to this https://github.com/rphrishi4/RiMusic4ios?tab=readme-ov-file

[–] ace_garp@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

For Creative Commons music,

Jamendo Radio has many genre channels of radio to listen to:

https://www.jamendo.com/radios

[–] Nusm@yall.theatl.social 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Doesn’t Pandora & Spotify have free tiers with ads?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Had to drop my Spotify subscription. Figured I grew up on radio and broadcast TV, few ads won't bother. Yeah, not like they do.

Maybe I'm paranoid, but I'd swear the ads were reasonable for a bit before they went nuts with them. Feels like I'm being bullied in renewing.

[–] Nusm@yall.theatl.social 3 points 5 days ago

Feels like I'm being bullied in renewing.

Oh, make no mistake about it, you absolutely are. But OP asked about free options, and Spotify is one. A bad one, but still one.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 week ago

The radio has been playing free music since 1906.

[–] MicrowavedTea@infosec.pub 25 points 1 week ago

Most if not all music is on YouTube for free already. Maybe the equivalent is the sites that let you download music from YouTube and these come and go like the movie streaming sites.

[–] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

None of them could compete with Youtube

[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

So Pluto TV can compete against YT with their old school cartoons? Because I love those damn old cartoons that they have lol.

[–] uservoid1@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

People don't like to hustle with pirate sites if given reasonable alternatives. Currently youtube, spotify, apple music and online radio stations fulfill these demands. Just like netflix originally killed most of pirate streaming, it was easier just to pay a bit to get all the content, then content providers decided each to create their one limited content service and pirates were back in business. Once you'll have to pay a different providers to hear different songs you'll start seeing more and more pirate music streaming sites.

[–] sevan@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not sure I understand. You can stream music for free on Spotify, Tidal, Deezer, Pandora, Bandcamp, YouTube, and probably several other services. Not to mention the thousands of radio stations you can stream. It seems like there are exponentially more music streaming options compared to video. If you're asking about sites where you can stream without ads, I'm guessing those exist too, but I suspect most people are either willing to listen to ads or pay for ad-free with one of those services.

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or they use ublock origin.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

uBO + YT background play add-on on Firefox Mobile is a game changer

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

RIAA was famously litigious but music was also much more widely available to pirate so it made it harder for streaming services to offer enough value to tempt users away from piracy. Services like pandora that (originally, at least) offered good value in terms of music discovery were the only ones to really offer a compelling reason not to pirate.

When it comes to movies, though, the much larger file sizes kept piracy a more niche activity for longer. When I was in uni pretty much everyone was running Kazaa or similar for music, but only techy folks would put in the effort to pirate videos.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You look at the screen while watching video, making ads profitable (they obstruct the view making you click something to close it, hijacking the click and generating visits).

If you do it for music people walk away and nobody clicks on the ads.

[–] zoostation@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Spotify will force you to listen to an ad by pausing it if you mute the volume, then resuming it when you unmute.

I quit Spotify long ago so I don't know if they still do it today, but they do have a way to force ads.

[–] hisao@ani.social 5 points 1 week ago

It's because streaming in movies is exactly the same one thing everyone thinks about, while streaming in music is dozen of different things and you meant just a single particular one while excluding all others. If we consider all types of music streaming, there are countless free streaming services for this: youtube, soundcloud, mixcloud, spotify, thousands of internet radios.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

The payout for audio ads is a lot less than video advertising. It's just not as profitable to do an entirely ad-supported music streaming service as a video one

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? YouTube? The Pirate Bay? The radio? I'm honestly don't understand why these sites don't count.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

I love Pirate Bay and torrents, but there's barely any music there. The rare time I find something there, it has 0 seeds.

Soulseek, on the orher hand...

YouTube Music + decent Adblocker or Vivaldi Browser.

[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Availability. You can just straight up search on YouTube to find a song and find it. Same goes on Spotify. If you're not an audiophile, no one would care if the song quality is low. If you listen to well known songs, you can likely find the music files available on public trackers and youtube.

If you care about a certain style of music not available on public tracker and want higher quality files; you likely can find a private tracker invite through people that listen to it. So there's no reason for both people to use a music piracy site.

[–] unknown1234_5@kbin.earth 1 points 1 week ago

because Spotify has no real competition, the music mafia has no reason to change their business model, and people are less tolerant of ads in their music.