this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
501 points (94.2% liked)

Technology

60456 readers
4104 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 4 points 27 minutes ago

Mark Zuckerberg is a whiny piss baby.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 3 points 1 hour ago

What about those of us who never joined?

[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

He's been taking testosterone hasn't he.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 19 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
  1. Announces moderation team gutted

  2. Announces that "community notes" will handle moderation

  3. Make a bunch of moves to purge anyone in the community that might actually provide a factual "community note"

[–] gashead76@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Damn, I didn’t think of it quite like that, but yup, that’s exactly the result.

[–] Bruncvik@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

I quit Facebook because it stopped showing updates from my friends and groups I subscribed to. I couldn't care less about Zuck's political leanings as long as his product had any use for me.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 hours ago

Anyone who claims someone is virtue signalling is virtue signalling. Except this one comment.

[–] grid11@lemy.nl 2 points 1 hour ago

like in this app used by 2 billion unique users globally?

[–] gex@lemmy.world 19 points 4 hours ago

Anyone who stops using my product is a poo poo head

[–] Vaggumon@lemm.ee 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Well then, since 2016 I've been a Virtue signaling mother fucker. Fuck Zuck!

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 2 points 2 hours ago

Me too, since 2014, before it was a thing, according to Google trends. Does that make us hipsters? We did it before it was cool.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I quit Facebook years ago because it's a shitty website full of spam.

IG has gone down the same path. It's like 70% suggested/sponsored content that's worthless at best if not disinfo, propaganda, fraud, etc.

Fash make trash.

[–] lustyargonian@lemm.ee 3 points 4 hours ago

You've been virtue signalling all this while!?

[–] penguinclaw@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 2 points 2 hours ago

I think it would also be fair to say that anyone who doesn't is also virtue signaling.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 16 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

20 years ago, a piece of shit like Mark Zuckerberg would have used a similarly meaningless term like “political correctness” instead. Made no sense then and makes no sense now. What is the problem exactly? Is there something wrong with having an ethical framework and applying it consistently? Or, having standards? Using this framing, any ideological viewpoint is inherently bad, including the nihilistic and hypocritical one that Zuckerberg himself is expressing here. It’s all just nonsense, and further evidence that the economy that plied this asshole with so much wealth is anything but a meritocracy.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 1 points 2 hours ago

Perhaps a mediocracy?

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago

The kind of people who would be bothered by being accused of "Virtue Signaling" are also the kind of people who are aligned with the rise of fascism and enabling of racism on the platform. But do go on acknowledging that working for Meta is itself an immoral position.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 hours ago

I quit before virtue signalling was a term that people used to describe things they don't like. I wonder what he would have called it back around 2012?

[–] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 19 points 6 hours ago

So he has confirmed that Meta is, as whole, a negative hasn't he?

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 48 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

LMFAO virtue signal deez nuts. Fuckerberg.

I haven't had Facebook in 10 years lol. I don't have a vote on this one.

Don't virtue signal me, bro!

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 8 hours ago

What I find delicious is that he is implicitly stating that being on any Meta platform is not virtuous.

[–] ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 hours ago

Why didn't he just say anyone who quits Meta smells like poo-poo and pee-pee? That would at least be funny.

[–] five82@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Zuck is a fucking piece a shit. But the headline and article misrepresents what he was saying. His actual quote was "Some people may leave our platforms for virtue signaling" and appears to be directed towards users, not Meta employees.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 3 points 4 hours ago

Nah man, clearly you missed the memo that we now just take every statement out of it's obvious context and straw man the shit out of everything.

It hurts every real argument against these people when people make stupid arguments like this.

[–] Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I virtue signaled 7 years ago when the whole Cambridge Analytica scandal broke, realizing that Facebook is a seedy company that can't be trusted.

[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Same, also, Zuckerberg has always been a sketch ball who does anti-social and user hostile things with his app, so it was just years of being fed up with that. 2017 was just the straw that broke the camel’s back.

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 8 hours ago

"Signaled" my "virtue" in 2016. Fuck you, zuck.

[–] Fizz 32 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

No its called having morals and standing by them. Virtue signaling is when you pay lip-service to a cause and don't walk the walk. Almost like zuck doing his dei stuff when it was popular and doing a 180 as soon as it becomes slightly unpopular.

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

I think it is quite beautiful to see how much <some politically, even if self-perceived, powerful person who is a moral trashheap> falls into the usual strong narcisism tendencies of projection.

[–] nightlily@leminal.space 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It’s kinda crazy how fast he’s unraveling into the right-wing griftersphere. Does Thiel or Putin have something on him?

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

maybe he just feels comfortable letting the facade drop

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 11 points 6 hours ago

Exactly. Zucc was always a POS. I mean, FB got its start so he could rate the "hotties" on campus...

[–] archchan@lemmy.ml 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Your hubris is showing, Fuckerberg.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

When I was a teen, I thought anyone who joins it is virtue signaling.

[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 32 points 12 hours ago

he means 'is showing virtue'. And he's right.

[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 31 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

The title alone shows admittance that leaving Meta signals virtue and good character.

[–] ToastySaff@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

“Some people may leave our platforms for virtue signaling, but I think the vast majority and many new users will find that these changes make the products better”

So he's stripping away protections for marginalised groups to appeal to the "vast majority" who, by definition, don't need these protections and are in no way negatively impacted by their existence. Got it, and fuck you very much.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 39 points 14 hours ago

Why should I care what a self confessed pedophile thinks?

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 33 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Will this decade be known as "the decade when billionares spiralled out of control"? First Musk then this android.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 17 points 12 hours ago

Imagine what Rockefeller and Carnegie would have tweeted about. You know they were crass, detached from reality hemorrhoid clusters, they just didn't get to spew it to a global audience 900 times a day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago

isn't this giant sack of shit laying off like 1000 employees?

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

This is exactly the kind of thing a loser would say. Loser CEOs are always whining about people leaving their platform. Winners keep their head down and build something their users actually enjoy using.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago

Oh no, not virtue signaling! There truly is no greater crime! Specifically, it isn't worse to be an overly-built, soulless chia pet if that's what you're thinking. Definitely not.

[–] Throskie@midwest.social 1 points 7 hours ago

Lotta reasons and responses here i plan on using for when i finally make my "fuck you all i quit" post this weekend.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 41 points 16 hours ago

Joke's on him. I quit before it was Meta.

load more comments
view more: next ›