this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
469 points (99.4% liked)

3DPrinting

15954 readers
758 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Technically it’s for any printer capable of printing a firearm or the components of a firearm, which is…. every printer. What a bafflingly stupid proposal. If you’re in NY, please call your reps and tell them to oppose this bill.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 36 minutes ago

Surely it would be much easier to require checks to buy ammunition.

[–] alleycat@lemmy.world 2 points 33 minutes ago

If you're european and ask yourself why 3D printed guns are such an issue in the US: It’s not because entire guns are easy to print (or printable at all), It’s because of their idiotic gun laws: in the US, the only controlled part is the receiver or frame, which often enough is made of plastic anyway, while the most important part -the barrel- is freely obtainable.

[...]frames or receivers of firearms are "firearms" as defined in the law and are subject to the same controls as complete firearms."

Germany has a similar law, except that every part of the gun is controlled.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Im making a charcoal foundry. You gonna card me for briquettes bitchboy?

[–] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 9 points 12 hours ago

Again. This bill was introduced last year, by the same person, and it died at the time because of some grassroots actions. Now, the wording is slightly different (so it can be introduced again as a "different" bill), and it's being tried again.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 19 hours ago

Oh boy can’t wait for them to ban two pipes that fit inside each other and a nail.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 24 points 21 hours ago

Luigi had no background to check.

This is pure flail.

[–] SloppyPuppy@lemmy.world 23 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

What about a bunch of stepper motor and some plastic. Do I need a background check for that?

[–] fluxx@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago

Well, everyone knows only main boards have a serial number, so you need a permit for that. But the rest is a spare part, you can get it freely.

/s

[–] Marvelicious@fedia.io 10 points 20 hours ago

Politicians are such profoundly unserious people.

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Lol, I built a 3d printer with a 3d printer.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 8 hours ago

seriousoly?

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago

You wouldn't download a 3D Printer!

[–] ClydapusGotwald@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 points 20 hours ago

Oh don't worry, there will be a third. And a fourth. And a... Well, more and more until it passes

It only has to pass once

[–] ashley0_0@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

new york will do anything but fix actual problems lmao

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tht@social.pwned.page 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This is braindead, are they gonna require background checks for the hardware store next?

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 0 points 11 hours ago

You literally need ID to purchase silverware in the UK. Yes, they will absolutely do this.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 7 points 1 day ago

Don't forget sporting goods and kitchen supplies. Heck, you can get a bunch of decent knives in IKEA, better put furniture outlets on a watchlist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Any engineer worth their salt can do this without a 3d printer. Idiots.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Next up, you’re going to have to register your drill press, lathe, etc.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Printcrime was not an instruction manual.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Are they going to require background checks for purchasing metal working equipment? Or maybe just make it illegal to bring any metal to melting point without a license.

Because you can make guns with metal.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

It just buy a gun third party or at a gun show in a state without background check requirements.

This isn't rocket science.

[–] deFrisselle@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 hours ago

Background checks are a Federal requirement and any transfer requires it go through an FFL for just that reason There is no Gun Show Loophole

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Ah yes, but then they'll just make it illegal to buy and own 2nd hand stuff.

[–] deFrisselle@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 hours ago

Book publishers tried that years ago They lost and the First Sale Doctrine was born

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Very easy to hit your police quotas in a city where everyone is constantly committing crimes through basic commerce.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 177 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Luigi would have passed a background check.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 28 points 1 day ago

Tell us your corporate paymasters are afraid without saying they're afraid.

load more comments
view more: next ›