this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
283 points (98.3% liked)

movies

2033 readers
503 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Adam McKay says the Jennifer Lawrence and Leonardo DiCaprio-starring satire resonates with a widespread feeling of being deceived by government and media

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I just wanna die and join the absolute as described in the CIA Gateway Project files

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago

It was a fun watch. I guess it hits different depending on where youre from.

[–] Pazintach@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This movie is painful to watch. I'm sort of glad for those who don't have children.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I think this is complimenting the movie, but I'm uncertain of your intent.

[–] Pazintach@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, it is a compliment to the movie. It's mostly Climate Change for me, as I live in a coast area where we already suffered all sorts of things because of it. But it seems there is little can be done to stop those who chose to ignore the evidences.

Edit: And sorry for my English if I haven't explant myself better. It is far from my first language.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

There is no need to apologize for your language. I don't know what your native one is, but I'm sure I'd be far less competent in yours than you are in mine. Well done for conveying your message!

I'm sorry about what you seem to be describing as a fairly hopeless environment. May I ask whereabout you are?

[–] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

When your movie is on the frontpage of Netflix with a handful of A listers and effectively "free", a half billion views is actually not that great. You were handed success on a silver platter.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 hours ago

Pretty sure that every Netflix movie does not get 500,000,000 views.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

But on the other hand I don't think it's entirely fair to dismiss a number that high. I think it kind of reads like a film most people wouldn't necessarily watch if they viewed any info about it before watching it

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 11 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I couldn't make it through, that whole start scene with the suited cunts talking over and mocking just triggered huge aggro.

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I found it difficult to watch when i did due to the situation, maybe not right in covid but not out of it either. As depressing as it made me feel at points (girlfriends choice of movie so had to sit through it but we alternate so only fair) I found it amusing that while plainly satire the actual dialogue and actions were pretty much what at least one democratically elected administration showed during a huge crisis. If it aired 10 years previous it'd probably be in the bin of crappy spoof movies for being so ridiculous and maybe get a cult folowing, yet it was practically a documentary with the situation changed.

I can understand not feeling comfortable due to the triggering in it though, it wasn't exactly a fun watch even if it was a comedy.

[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Ha. Remember when Idiocracy was just a funny movie making fun of us and not prophecy.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago

We're going to legalize prostitution? Have it so that you can get into any high paying job you want without a college degree while still automating the work no one wants to do? Put the smartest man in the world in charge of our worst problems, which we are acknowledging exist?

Seriously, Idiocracy is a utopia compared to reality, I will die on this hill.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Oh I'm disgusted by that behaviour irl, so i'm disgusted by it on screen. I do not think i'm the target audience for this film, i consider climate deniers to be traitors against humanity

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

It wasn't till I read you original comment that I remembered how awful I felt at one point watching it, I get it and understand not wanting to subject yourself to that sort of feeling willingly. Thankfully it passed and I was able to watch, but I won't say I enjoyed it, just that in an art sense it has merit.

[–] PixellatedDave@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

For me it was the end scene which broke me.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 3 hours ago

Idk I loved watching them eat the rich

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 134 points 17 hours ago (12 children)

I liked the movie. The metaphor was as subtle as a club to the forehead, but it was entertaining and meaningful.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 57 points 15 hours ago

The unsubtlety of the metaphor is the metaphor though.

I honestly think this will be a future classic if society survives long enough for such things.

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 hours ago

Not subtle enough. Some conspiracy theorists think it’s about the Covid vaccine.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 21 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The metaphor was as subtle as a club to the forehead

Count me in as someone who missed the club to the forehead. I enjoyed the whole movie, then said to my wife "wow they really went hard on drawing all those parallels to COVID."

My wife nicely informed me that the movie was actually about climate change.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

It's mostly about climate change, but I don't think you missed it if you thought Covid.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] crawancon@lemm.ee 69 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

the movie was gloriously frustrating.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 21 points 17 hours ago

Great description of it.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 18 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I can't bring myself to watch it. I saw a trailer, and my blood started to boil.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago

20 years ago it would have been considered a farce!

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't really know what it was about, and I watched it shortly after the November elections. I thought it was funny, but did I ever pick a bad time to watch it. It lost a lot of the overall joke feeling and while still farcical, now it's a little too close to reality.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

My GF hated it.

I watched it for the second time recently

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cycle0861@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

People who are convinced Climate change is a thing, don't need this kind of movies to act. People who are convinced Climate change is a hoax took this movie like an insult to their kind. You need to be a better storyteller if you're going to convince people are in the wrong, according to you, about something, otherwise they feel attacked

[–] takenaps@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago

Fair, but I think there's still value in satire like this even if it doesn't achieve the goal of convincing the other side. It kinda serves to point at the absurdity from a fresh perspective

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

You need to be a better storyteller if you’re going to convince people are in the wrong, according to you, about something, otherwise they feel attacked

or perhaps they should be better, more informed consumers?

like, at some point people should be responsible for their own stupidity and self delusions.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

If they were informed, they wouldn't be consumers.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

fair. but hope remains.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 5 points 12 hours ago

I once had a conversation with someone about a hypothetical thing and they said it was the plot of this movie.

I eventually watched it after that.

[–] Moops@lemmy.world 19 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah audience scores are my jam. Critics have failed me time and time again.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

What is up with that??? Lately I find myself aligning a lot more with audience scores. Movies that critics are rating high leave no impression on me anymore and I'm an obsessed movie watcher.

[–] Nythos@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago

It feels like critics are too busy huffing their own farts and generally audience scores are a larger sample size

[–] Moops@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

It seems like critics are turning more and more inward, and what they appreciate is increasingly esoteric. So the stuff they like is less accessible to the unwashed masses like myself because if you're not staying up to date on the latest and greatest trends in the medium, it doesn't make sense why they rate something so highly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I only saw it cause it got a Oscar nomination and agree with the critics on this one.

It all felt a little off, like it was trying to be too many things at once. It jumped back and forth between what felt like parody/comedy/drama to the point it failed to do any particularly well. Or maybe it was a little too surreal to pull off the seriousness of the topic.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 3 points 11 hours ago

The vibe that I feel McKay was going for is the Simpsons meme with Ralph on the bus chuckling about being in danger. It feels like a dramedy, but so close to reality that you can't help but have that reaction. It's not necessarily a call to action, just a hey wake up and see how close we are to this shit.

[–] TIN@feddit.uk 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Critics didn't like it? I've seen it twice and think it's great!

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Critics didn't like it? Say less! I'm in!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›