Well, actually, the Nazis called it "Machtergreifung" and this is exactly the playbook Trump follows.

They hate you because you’re poor

That's just to cover up their obvious racism. If you interrogate them the right way, they eventually spit it out, although in a less coded way.

You're missing that this is a loyalty test.

It's not about finding out this info. It's about finding out who is willing to be the Reek in all the new House Bolton-style fiefdoms. That's why people only have 10 days to rat out colleagues, they want lists of trustworthy loyalists by the time mid-tier appointees get into the office.

Says a bit about the potency of those intelligence agencies, maybe? Or the vigor with which these policies will be pursued - or lack thereof. I dunno.

Or like the US in the 50s and 60s...

It's only illegal if they don't have the courts on their side.

The SCOTUS can "interpret" a challenged Jay walking law as "well this clearly says the President can order the killing of all the minorities with abandon" and that's it, no recourse short of physically fighting and dying to them.

And that's where we're at. The Federalist Society that began under Reagan was a slow moving coup.

The framers slept in on Checks on the Judicial day. An impossibly high senate impeachment bar. For that reason and more, our constitution needs to collapse and we need a new one, one that treats practiced greed, ie pursuing many times more than what your fellow citizens live on, as the central threat to society that it is.

Just use it to sign up for as many shit spam newsletters as possible. Maybe considering disabling that adblocker (or maybe spin up a vm) and enter it into all the ad popups you can find.

Godspeed to all of the new accounts created on ultra-questionable porn sites with this email address.

Just tell them you're colorblind

Wrong. U libs always mishear what trump wrote. She didn't turn us all into woman. She signed a executive order that all men are trans men. U have been a women all along. I swear libruls can't read anything anymore.

How'd I do? Convincing as a trump apologist?

He just had a wide stance!

Is this about DEI hires or workers whose jobs are to ensure their hiring practices promote diversity, equality, and inclucivity? I took it to mean that if Susie in HR has a job description that includes anything about diversity in hiring, federal workers are supposed to rat on Susie or face consequences. Not on the folks who maybe arguably were hired because their presence increase diversity, equality, and/or inclucivity.

Ah I found a mistake

(b) Telegraph

(1) Delay the transmission and delivery of telegrams to enemy destinations.

(2) Garble telegrams to enemy destinations so that another telegram will have to be sent or a long distance call will have to be made. Sometimes it will be possible to do this by changing a single letter in a word—for example, changing “minimum” to “maximum,” so that the person receiving the telegram will not know whether “minimum” or “maximum” is meant.

Surely the intended word is "manimum" because it's one letter from minimum and one letter from maximum.