this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
244 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19556 readers
2040 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 159 points 2 days ago (6 children)

He literally just wants to avoid paying for CA wildfire recovery.

The hilarious thing is that the biggest FEMA beneficiaries are red states and these climate change related disasters are externalities of the way red states do business.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 days ago

This would just help him avoid having to help every state. He would still make special arrangements to help the people who helped him. He's entirely corrupt.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Personally, it really makes me depressed and crave sugar.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Acrimonious@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] useyourmainfinger@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's a tough choice, do I get the eggs this week or the cocaine?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago

I'd go with cocaine. Between "don't say bird flu" orders and relaxing regulations to lower the price of eggs, eggs seem expensive and risky

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Don't worry about it, rail this line

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

And my axe?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah, and those states will continue to get that aid when they need it.

Really dont see why this is hard to understand.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

how many states have fully-staffed and funded equivalents ready to deploy on a moment's notice to a large-scale emergency? probably count 'em all on one hand, while simultaneously giving lord diaper the bird.

'federal' assistance will be there in time for hurricane season.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Who is going to hand out that federal assistance, my guess it goes to the rich instead of the needy. Oligarchs will take it all.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah the money will go to private contractors

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I assume all states have a state level Emergency Management Agency - they must, right? Right?

It’s the funding that’s the hard part. Just like any other insurance type of scheme, there will be incidents too big for the individuals to manage, which is hey we pool our funds to better handle them. I’m sure there are local emergencies they’re ready for, but what moron really thinks their state is prepared to handle a major hurricane, for example

[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Maybe if there was a natural disaster at Mar-A-Lago his position would swing immediately.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Florida is already a natural disaster.

[–] ronalicious@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

climate change gonna get there eventually

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

No it wouldn't. He already said he wants to move to a direct grant model. Red states get more, blue states get nothing unless they make conservative concessions.

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

That information only comes from looking into this at more than just a surface level and developing an opinion based on your gut, which Trump is incapable of doing. So the red states are screwed.

[–] Yodan@lemm.ee 52 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Trumps agenda seems to be literally undo anything that made the USA a functioning country. Anything remotely positive, undo.

Treason.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Treason already happened (Jan 6)

This is just Treason+

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

We've had first treason, what about second treason?

[–] jimjam5@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Dang it, it sounds almost like a subscription that tax payers will end up having to pay into

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Treason with extra treason steps.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Every function the government fails to provide is an opportunity for people to pay for a commercial alternative. Where functioning countries provide national healthcare, Americans can pay private companies. Shutting down FEMA is an opportunity for companies to offer new kinds of disaster insurance, an opportunity for Trump-branded temporary housing, Trump-branded search & rescue. The list goes on.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 days ago

That's the entire point of the Republican party

[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s very bureaucratic. And it’s very slow.

Oh well he'd like to know about the Homeland Security Act of 2002. That's when we took FEMA and merged it with Department of Homeland Security and mixed all these neat book keeping tricks. Like this one where border patrol has to get money from FEMA for particular payments related to housing capture illegal border crossings.

Now you may ask, "Why on Earth would we do something like that?" Well, because 9/11! That's why!

Yeah, for the folks who were trying to beg for reason and a level head in the aftermath of the worse terrorist attack on the United States, they would be right up there with Trump about how FEMA since 9/11 has slowly converted into a red tape mess. I don't think anyone in FEMA will debate that the red tape is a good thing.

But that's about as far as Trump goes in being right before he gets to:

I’d like to see the states take care of disasters

States WOULD NOT take care of them. They would just create various insurances that they would require citizens to pay into. And then those funds would be at the whim of the State Government not being corrupt, which for the southeastern states (I'm in one of them, Tennessee) that would be like asking a cocaine addict to be in charge of the cocaine evidence.

sniff sniff I have no idea why all these criminals keep going free! sniff snifffffffff

I mean I don't know, maybe we ought to bring back tar and feathering our local politicians. I thought we could move past that point, but you know, shit sometimes the old ways work best.

FEMA just hasn’t done the job

FEMA has done exactly the job that Congress has legislated them to do. If FEMA is failing in someone's opinion, we needn't look any further than Congress.

He also said individual states should be in charge of directing response to natural disasters rather than FEMA, and that the federal government should only step in subsequently to provide funding.

sigh

This is overly simplified. States know best where things are hit hardest and what the priority for rebuilding should be. FEMA will absolutely use their decades of experience in disasters to help state governments get the most out of their funds. If I was to try to make a metaphor here. States are in the driver's seat, FEMA will act as the GPS, and Congress is the gas tank. FEMA will try to get the most mileage out of your gas tank as possible, but States can totally change course and FEMA will try it's best to plot a good destination based on the new course given the limited amount of fuel the State has.

As always, it's a subject that is complex that Trump feels that the complexity doesn't deserve to be address but instead done away with and make the complexity someone else's problem.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Just gonna toss the reality that the same group responsible for project 2025 wrote the Patriot act too

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

He's purposely trying to make people poor so that oligarchs can take more.

Pretty much like his pump & dump bitcoin...

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i guess he will spit out a million shitty ideas until one resonates with the retarded maga movement/majority of US citizens.

lets just wait for the looming pandemic. this time we'll just shut up about reasonable ways to handle problems and let the stupid people die.

how is that birdflu to human transmission going? evolving faster than cow desease? I'd be suprised if the next 4 yrs go well for the USA.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You do realize that most of these are not just "ideas," they are fully-formed Executive Orders, penned by the Federalist Society, specifically to be released in week 1.

These are real things that are already in progress...

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

Not only that, they have already announced their alternative is to FEMA. It's federal block grants for each emergency instance. That way they can give more to red states, and tie aid to whatever conservative policy they want to implement in blue states.

[–] SelfProgrammed@lemmy.today 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Trump is asking to get Luigi'd

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Considering the last two assassination attempts on this orange Nazi came from his Nazi base, just think if his base didn't get a government handout after being hit by another man made climate disaster.

[–] forrgott@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I been starting to wonder if the first one was deliberately allowed to happen, in the hopes it would make him a martyr. Just felt real odd...

And as someone else said elsewhere in the replies, I have little doubt his base would be given special dispensation, while any blue state will be left to fend for themselves.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Like 20% of his base is intermingled throughout blue states. That's a lot of voters for him to screw over. Trump doesn't do anything with a scalpel, he does it with a hammer. His voters will be fucked eventually.

Only needed a few cm to the right 🤦‍♂️

Practice before y'all go hunting

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He is performing exactly as his owners want, and therefore will be fine.

[–] SelfProgrammed@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

Luigi wouldn't care about owners

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I remember just a couple of months back Trump was accusing Biden of stealing money from FEMA? Looks like he wants to take all of it himself...

yeah...

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Any time they level an accusation they're telling on themselves

[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 7 points 2 days ago

Let’s get rid of you, Rape Reagan

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I propose getting rid of orange fuckwad asap before his dickriders start salivating

[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 days ago

Putin's Puppet is open to finding all the avenues to weaken the USA from every angle.