486
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

The Trump administration emailed air traffic controllers urging them to quit and accept buyouts 24 hours after a fatal Reagan plane crash.

At 8:30 p.m. Thursday, the email urged federal employees to pursue private-sector jobs, offering pay incentives and vacation benefits while on government payroll.

This program contradicts established rules by allowing second employment, sparking union concerns about losing experienced personnel amid an air traffic controller shortage.

Trump blamed previous administrations for safety issues and misrepresented FAA standards, intensifying culture wars as officials remain uncertain about the buyout program's future.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] ultranaut@lemmy.world 157 points 2 years ago

Given the persistent and extreme understaffing of air traffic controllers it wouldn't take that many quitting at the same time to have a massive impact.

[-] athairmor@lemmy.world 49 points 2 years ago

What do the think is going to happen? Privatize air traffic control? Or just rank the economy so bad they buy everything up?

[-] goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 2 years ago

Well the cynic in me says "to undermine the public trust in the safety of air travel so people become more isolated, unwilling to organize, and dependent on either corporate-controlled media or gasoline-powered cars to maintain contact with any part of the world outside a 20-mile radius," and the nutjob conspiracy theorist in me sure thinks he could make a convincing corkboard out of it if you gave him enough thumb tacks and red string, but once again I could be making the mistake of assuming they're going into this with a plan and not just flailing wildly to make it look like they're addressing a problem they have no idea how to solve.

[-] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago

just flailing wildly to make it look like they’re addressing a problem they have no idea how to solve.

Yeah, rumor goes this started because the FAA had issues with Starship blowing up and raining debris, and Musk deciding to teach them a lesson.

[-] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago

It's more that SpaceX has consistently lied on the forms that it gave the FAA, EPA, etc and have been cited multiple times. (See the saga about the blast deflection plate and the deluge water being industrial runoff they were letting drain into the nearby protected wetlands)

The starship exploding thing was a proverbial slap on the wrist and Elon still threw a fit.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

The thing is that the Starship issue really isn't that big a deal. There is always an FAA investigation after every spacecraft or aircraft flight anomaly.

It's not the first time and definitely won't be the last that a craft will fail to get to orbit, especially experimental ones like Starship units current iterative form.

The bigger question with the Starship anomaly is whether the active flight routes in that area during the launch window were normal or unexpected. Closer to the launch site there are large restricted areas, and launches are negotiated ahead of time and paths well known. Planes aren't normally under the direct flight path for that exact reason.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

In Hungary, Fidesz just either forces the media to not report on protests until they can get a picture where they can pretend only a few people attended, or they send the "football fans" (skinheads) in.

[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

That has already been suggested by his minions. Let the airlines manage everything. Including baggage and body checking.

Oh god, the very idea...

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

Even if that's your goal getting ATCs to simply quit all at once isn't the way to go about it lol. I hope it works. It'll ground all flights and cripple the country and bring this stupidity to it's conclusion quickly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago
[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

That is one angle. Hmm.

[-] silly_crotch@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

He could totally intend to privatise ATC. They're already halfway done with privatising education, and there's no need to even mention healthcare.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

US can into theocratic Stone Age.

[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

On Friday, speaking about his plan for federal workers during a press conference, Trump stated: “It’s our dream to have everyone, almost, working in the private sector, not the public sector.”

They literally want to privatize every government function they possibly can. They're saying it out loud, and have been for some time, and with control of all three branches of the federal government there's absolutely nobody to stand in their way. So buckle up because things are about to get very bumpy.

[-] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Just get ChatGPT do it or something

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] donuts@lemmy.world 111 points 2 years ago

How does it go again? "In the midst of every crisis, lies great opportunity"

The fact that they are using these tragic events as a means to dismantle the government even more quickly is horrifying to watch from the other end of the pond.

[-] Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com 31 points 2 years ago

What's the old saying...

Never waste a crisis

Or something like that?

[-] TwanHE@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

Never let a good crisis go to waste.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

Chaos is a ladder

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago

Ah yes, just what we need right now... FEWER controllers in an industry that's already short-staffed, and with two very recent fatal plane crashes. Perfect fucking idea.

[-] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 55 points 2 years ago

If their aim is to kill as many Americans as possible, they are doing a superb job. By that metric, Trump is the best president of all times.

[-] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

I do hope the majority who get canned and who suffer voted for him. Everyone else, including myself, I feel sorry for and hope we can either ride it out or get out. His supporters should go down with the ship poor and depleted.

[-] kembik@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago

Seems like he's going for maximum damage, bet he gets a Russian airlift from the white house just before it crumbles.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 54 points 2 years ago

You know what, fuck it. I hope they quit. Let’s accelerate this whole bullshit to its conclusion as fast as possible. Seems to me the only way through this fascist hellscape is by pissing off enough people to provoke a popular response.

[-] Bloodyhog@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago

A lot of people had this attitude in Russia. Let the evil guys run the country to the ground, and then rebuild into a better structure. This will happen, I think, the only problem is that can take decades and millions of people dead in the process. No suggestions here, just a note...

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I think you underestimate just exactly how popular Putin is with the Russian people, or I should say was originally. I don't think he's as popular now because of the "police action" in Ukraine and the number of Russians who have died to it and the economic hit the country has taken as a result of it. But he was insanely popular with the Russian populace through most of the 2010s.

[-] FanciestPants@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Didn't he win his last election with something like 94% of the vote. The dude is outrageously popular... or there might be something else going on.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Accelerationism is the stupidest idea ever. Shit being fucked is the natural state of things, and if you just let it slide, it will gradually come to it and stay there forever.

[-] Rooty@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Accelerationism is helping the enemy. You should be doing the exact opposite - resisting, rallying and counterattacking.

[-] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 48 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

In an apparent attempt to ignite the culture wars and further discredit the FAA, Trump falsely claimed that the agency’s website lists individuals with “hearing, vision, missing extremities, partial paralysis, complete paralysis, epilepsy, severe intellectual disability, psychiatric disability, and dwarfism” as “qualified” applicants for the air controller position, CBS News reported.

Wait. Wait...

and dwarfism

Okay. Everything in his claim is wholesale made up, but what could possibly be wrong with an air traffic controller having dwarfism? There is nothing inherent about that condition that should preclude a person from being able to do this job. Many ATC coordinate flights traveling through Class A airspace, which is way up in the stratosphere, using computers. They might need a higher seat or something to reach the controls, but that's it.

Trump genuinely thinks air traffic controllers just stare out windows all day, doesn't he? And because he says this, now ignorant people will be imagining that their plane is coordinated by a little person in a tower, standing on their tippy toes.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 25 points 2 years ago

Trump genuinely thinks air traffic controllers just stare out windows all day, doesn’t he? And because he says this, now ignorant people will be imagining that their plane is coordinated by a little person in a tower, standing on their tippy toes.

Given that Airports were key to our victory over the British literally a century before Airplanes were invented... Probably

[-] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 years ago

And missing extremities? Are we against employing disabled veterans? I thought we loved the military?

[-] Jesusaurus@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

Oh you mean the "suckers" and "losers"?

[-] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 36 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I see that Trump is trying to reduce US carbon output by drastically reducing commercial air traffic, either by simple lack of air traffic controllers or by making the public too scared to fly! Quite the environmentalist! /s

[-] Eddbopkins@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

it is not safe to work for the federal government in trump America

[-] ours@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

It's about to get unsafe to fly in the US.

[-] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago

It's about to get unsafe in the US.

[-] ours@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Sad but very likely as well.

That's what we get when Nazis are encouraged instead of getting punched in the face.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago
[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 14 points 2 years ago

Would be funny if all remaining ATCs decided to quit and get a job on a different country. Take the land route to Canada or Mexico, or a ship to elsewhere.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago

Maybe they could give AirForce1 some "special" instructions as their last duty before being kicked out of the building?

[-] ours@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Ironically Reagan fought ATC unions. They went on strike so he fired them and called in the military ATCs to cover their work.

[-] turmacar@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And it was kind of a shit show for awhile.

There's obviously overlap between military and civilian controllers, but it's not the same job. The volume of traffic alone at a busy hub makes most air force bases look like quaint backwater airstrips.

There's also just not a lot of "extra" military ATC.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 13 points 2 years ago

Pilot here. I fly little airplanes for fun.

Much of the ATC system is already understaffed by a good amount. Becoming a controller is not super easy, nor is it for everyone. You have to pass a fairly stringent medical test, background check etc, and then you go to their academy for a while. After that, they will assign you wherever they need you, which may be nowhere near where you actually wanted to live. What you make depends on where you are and what you do. So for example, if you man a small airport in the middle of Idaho, you make less than if you are an approach controller near JFK. Each position that you might work requires its own training and certification, and I don't just mean each physical location I mean like each chair, each working position. That's because each sector of the airspace has its own quirks, where traffic usually comes from and usually goes to, defined airways and GPS points and procedures and that sort of thing.

My point with all this, is that hiring and training new controllers is significantly harder than most other jobs. To use the earlier example, and approach controller near JFK is doing one of the most difficult and stressful jobs in aviation, and is easily making six figures. But to get that guy there, getting him trained and certified on everything took years and hundreds of thousands of dollars. If he resigns, whatever salary you save on him is a drop in the bucket compared to what it will cost to replace him.

Private sector controllers are a thing. Many small airports contract out their tower operations, but this is generally done at small regional airports.

Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of places where fat needs to be trimmed in the federal government. I don't believe ATC is one of them. And is certainly not a place where I want fat aggressively trimmed, because when you lose experience you reduce safety.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 years ago

he probably caused all this and is just blaming everyone else again

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

That'll help

[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Reply all... Likewise

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
486 points (98.2% liked)

News

39190 readers
2765 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS