137

Reuters, citing two anonymous sources, reported Friday that senior career officials at the Office of Personnel Management, the governing agency for the federal workforce, have had their access to department data revoked. They lost access to the Enterprise Human Resources Integration database, which includes the dates of birth, Social Security numbers, appraisals, home addresses, pay grades, and length of service of government workers.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 2 years ago
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Is there some magical shield around the server that prevents it from being smashed by hammers?

[-] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 years ago

The cops, most likely. Several government agencies, such as the FBI, have been ousting people involved in other incidents (like those involved with anything to do with Jan 6th). Musk's agents have also been physically locking people out of their own offices and going through their personal stuff.

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago

Probably a room with a locked door and armed guards.

[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Just put a piece of paper on one of the server inlets. It'll act like it's being ddosed in seconds. Broom dust is safer but less effecrive.

[-] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Original article is an opinion piece from The New Republic.

[-] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

How about an ongoing summary from one of The Onion's accounts on BlueSky?

https://bsky.app/profile/bencollins.bsky.social/post/3lh5ab2coi22e

Or The Wired article I posted elsewhere about another government agency where the same thing is happening:

https://www.wired.com/story/elon-musk-lackeys-general-services-administration/

Edit: Not to say that that isn't a valid point, but this is happening reported elsewhere, and I've seen people talking about multiple agencies who have been locked out of their offices by Musk's goons.

[-] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I appreciate the additional alternate links.

The Yahoo link masks the original source and it's only labeled as an opinion piece in the article. The contents of the article may be fine, but some folks will only have time to read the headline and jump to the comments.

It's a good point. Another good link is the Reuters article linked in the paragraph I grabbed, but I didn't think to link it in the original post.

this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
137 points (98.6% liked)

politics

31238 readers
2987 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS