this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
536 points (98.6% liked)

Fediverse memes

672 readers
555 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is it even a competition?

Afaik, lemmy doesn't compete. It just exists, and makes no effort as an entity to expand.

I'm not even sure if there are individual instances that do anything to seek out users, much less try to take them from other places.

[–] Elrecoal19_0@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I kinda wish they did so Reddit diasppears

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is no "they" really - it's up to us as users to promote it.

[–] Elrecoal19_0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

With "they", I meant the owners/mantainers, specifically. Without some promotion from their part, there aren't so much users to promote it further.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

No, if there's too hard of a push to get users then lemmy earns itself a bigger gun behind the crosshairs that are already aimed it (by platforms like Reddit).

If we have any hope of growing Lemmy into what it can eventually be, we need the growth to be gradual. As painstaking and aggravating as that might be.

I just bought a domain name yesterday with plans to create an instance for my local county. My killer idea is to have a comminity in the instsnce called "the good old days" where older folks can post their stories. I noticed that is a popular thing on facebook. The instance will not be federated as I don't want anything but content which is relavent to the county. It should be somewhat self regulating given the topic limitations. I probably won't even mention federation unless someone else wants to make an instance specific to a certain town or something. Just a way to filter out all the noise on facebook where people can see all tge different news outlets and events from accross the county without being filtered by fb et al.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 61 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I’m not sure but it’s been working wonders for desktop Linux for the technically inclined.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Weeeeell, as someone who moved from windows to Mint a few weeks back, Steam and proton have had a big hand in that, so I wouldn't say it's a good example of "doing nothing".

Edit: granted, Microsoft constantly shooting their own feet doesn't help, but Steam broke the cage by providing what was missing.

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not to downplay what Valve and all of the countless Linux contributers are doing and have accomplished, but I wouldn't be on Linux if Windows hasn't gone to shit.

I was basically a 30 year long Windows fanboy. It got so bad that it drove me away. And now I'm a Linux fanboy.

[–] M137@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

And for Valve.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

“Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake."

—Napoleon Bonaparte

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It is currently called the United States of America

[–] Hackworth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Spy sappin mah sentry!

[–] veroxii@aussie.zone 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The side fucking up is called "the art of the deal"

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

They could avoid taxes on the proceeds with the deal of the art.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It’s crazy to me how there’s percentage of gamers who think this guy is THEIR billionaire, and this is THEIR game corporation, and it somehow makes it different or more ethical than all the other billionaires and corporations.

[–] raskolnikov@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In a world where enshitification is the norm, the bar is so low that keeping a product with good quality is enough to be deified by some. But surely those gamers that worship Gabe just do it for the memes right? (Don't answer)

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 day ago

Valve being privately owned rather than having external shareholders probably helps them go for something sustainable rather than pushing for growth at all costs.

[–] liyunxiao@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's simply because the product is far superior to all other solutions on the market.

Not due to tricks, or marketing, or any weird strategies, but by simply solving the distribution problem for both the developers and consumers.

Yes all billionaires need to give up their wealth or literally be eaten, and all capitalism is inherently evil, but if we were to rank evil from least to most as especially liberals do in all other circumstances, then gaben and steam are on the least evil side of the spectrum.

Parasocial relationships get fucky

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As soon as the fediverse becomes an actual threat, the ban hammer is going to come down on anonymous social media

I'm honestly surprised it hasn't happened yet

[–] B312@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It’s still pretty niche as of now

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] archomrade@midwest.social 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It would probably be something like: "any social media site made available to US users must verify user identities and legal name and age and comply with US agencies' requests for user information. Violators will be subject to penalty, including but not limited to economic sanction and imprisonment"

Yes, there would be ways around it and yes, there would be nations who would not enforce it, but there being legal barriers to operating an instance would basically kill its adoption for normal users. I'm really tired of people saying 'you can just get a vpn' as if most people would go to any length at all to share memes with friends. The fediverse is already too complicated for most people to adopt before having to circumvent region blocks.

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Australia is already trying something like this, under the guise of protecting kids. Under 16 year olds are banned from social media starting in December, which is effectively the same as forcing identity verification. Don't know if Lemmy will be affected or not. But I'll ditch this account over giving my ID to "random dude running an instance".

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

UK occasionally talks about this kind of thing too. Recently had something come in that caused some web forums to shut down as it was unenforceable for a small forum but the big companies will either comply, pretend to comply or pay/ignore the fines.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel like that would probably Streisand effect

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Which would increase their effort to chase it down and make regular people avoid it.

Not that it would deter you, but the network would essentially stop growing and no longer be a real competitor

[–] DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Couldn't have social media without Americans.

Actually wait yes can we apply this to Lemmy?

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

Ordinarily I would be sensitive to accusations of america-centrism, but the US has a tendency of bullying their allies into following their regulatory measures so I don't think this is just a US problem.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

I guess we will see, maybe.

[–] Oth@lemmy.zip 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Stability, reliability, don't fix it if it ain't broke.

Some companies have a need to reinvent them every 6 months to justify some middle Manager's existence so they can pad their resume for the next overpaid job position.

This Is what it looks like when you don't have that problem

[–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Accurate. There's significant overlap between Fediverse managers, developers, and users. Everyone's goals for the platform are always closely aligned.

[–] fourexample@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This actually just describes the main problem in almost every industry these days. Companies are so large and have so many people running them that at each rung of the ladder, priorities are completely different since it's impossible for someone in middle management to have any clue what's going on in manufacturing, or vice versa.

Then all of them get overshadowed equally by the monetary priorities of the CEO.

[–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

And if they gain a monopoly, they're able to separate their priorities from those of their users. That's when the enshitification begins.

[–] brillotti@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

Doing it the Valve way.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Often in the daodejing also called wei wu wei: "acting without action" or "doing without doing"

Truly: this is The Way

[–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago

The only winning move is not to play.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 9 points 2 days ago

Anti-Skibidity fr fr no cap

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 5 points 2 days ago

"Neutral jing".

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago